The ontological status of Malebranchean ideas
Journal of the History of Philosophy 36 (4):525-544 (1998)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJohn Protevi (forthcoming). Adding Deleuze to the Mix. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences.
John Stewart Gordon (2008). The Status of the in Vitro Embryo. Bioethics 22 (5):296–298.
Martin Mahner (1993). What Is a Species? A Contribution to the Never Ending Species Debate in Biology. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 24 (1):103 - 126.
Christopher McMahon (1995). The Ontological and Moral Status of Organizations. Business Ethics Quarterly 5 (3):541-554.
Lawrence Nolan (1997). The Ontological Status of Cartesian Natures. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78 (2):169–194.
Lynne Rudder Baker (2002). The Ontological Status of Persons. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (2):370-388.
Riin Sirkel (2011). Alexander of Aphrodisias's Account of Universals and its Problems. Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (3):297-314.
Roy Bhaskar (1997). On the Ontological Status of Ideas. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 27 (2&3):139–147.
Susan Peppers-Bates (2005). Does Malebranche Need Efficacious Ideas? The Cognitive Faculties, the Ontological Status of Ideas, and Human Attention. Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 (1):83-105.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads14 ( #83,117 of 549,087 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,087 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
