What is a truth value and how many are there?

Studia Logica 92 (2):183 - 201 (2009)
Abstract
Truth values are, properly understood, merely proxies for the various relations that can hold between language and the world. Once truth values are understood in this way, consideration of the Liar paradox and the revenge problem shows that our language is indefinitely extensible, as is the class of truth values that statements of our language can take – in short, there is a proper class of such truth values. As a result, important and unexpected connections emerge between the semantic paradoxes and the set-theoretic paradoxes.
Keywords Absolute Generality  Indefinite Extensibility  Liar Paradox  Revenge Problem  Semantics  Set Theory  Truth Value
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,371
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Matti Eklund (2005). What Vagueness Consists In. Philosophical Studies 125 (1):27-60.
Saul A. Kripke (1975). Outline of a Theory of Truth. Journal of Philosophy 72 (19):690-716.

View all 8 references

Citations of this work BETA
Philippe Schlenker (2010). Super Liars. Review of Symbolic Logic 3 (3):374-414.
Similar books and articles
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-07-11

Total downloads

99 ( #11,743 of 1,102,850 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

8 ( #29,626 of 1,102,850 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.