Graduate studies at Western
International Philosophical Quarterly 44 (4):549-566 (2004)
|Abstract||While the concept of sin plays a pivotal role in the ethico-religious philosophies of Kierkegaard and Kant, both struggle to provide an adequate account of the nature of sin. Kant’s ethical interpretation improves signifi cantly on the traditional theological account by introducing the notion of individual responsibility, but it ultimately fails to provide an explanation of the psychological mechanisms of the fall. Kierkegaard tries to unite the Kantian conception of responsibility with an essentially Hegelian interpretation of the fall, using the concept of anxiety as the glue. Contrary to usual opinion, it is argued here that far from resolving the difficulties of the Kantian account, Kierkegaard’s interpretation only serves to multiply them. But it is also shown that Kierkegaard’s analysis of the phenomenon that he calls “anxiety about sin” does provide the materials for an alternative interpretation of the origin of moral evil in man|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Christian Lotz (2006). The Events of Morality and Forgiveness: From Kant to Derrida. Research in Phenomenology 36 (1):255-273.
Vasiliki Tsakiri (2006). Kierkegaard: Anxiety, Repetition and Contemporaneity. Palgrave Macmillan.
Geoffrey Rees (2003). The Anxiety of Inheritance: Reinhold Niebuhr and the Literal Truth of Original Sin. Journal of Religious Ethics 31 (1):75 - 99.
Roe Fremstedal (2011). The Concept of the Highest Good in Kierkegaard and Kant. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (3):155-171.
J. F. Wyatt (1978). The Task of the Teacher and the Notion of Responsibility: A Moral and a Sociological Issue. Journal of Moral Education 7 (2):114-121.
W. Glenn Kirkconnell (2010). Kierkegaard on Sin and Salvation: From Philosophical Fragments Through the Two Ages. Continuum.
Céline Kermisch (2012). Risk and Responsibility: A Complex and Evolving Relationship. Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (1):91-102.
Suzanne M. Uniacke (2005). Responsibility and Obligation: Some Kantian Directions. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 13 (4):461 – 475.
William L. Rowe (2006). Free Will, Moral Responsibility, and the Problem of OOMPH. Journal of Ethics 10 (3):295-313.
Dolors Perarnau Vidal (2008). "El Temps de la Distinció Ha Passat, El Sistema l'A Vençut": A Propòsit Del Motto, El Pròleg I la Introducció d'El Concepte d'Angoixa de Søren Kierkegaard. Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 64 (2/4):1001 - 1020.
María Rosario Acosta Lópedelz (2007). Beauty as an Encounter Between Freedom and Nature: A Romantic Interpretation of Kant's Critique of Judgment. Epoché 12 (1):63-92.
Mark C. Taylor (2012). Time and Self. Journal of Philosophical Research 37 (Supplement):403-418.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads1 ( #292,381 of 739,347 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?