Turing's o-machines, Searle, Penrose, and the brain
Analysis 58 (2):128-138 (1998)
| Abstract | In his PhD thesis (1938) Turing introduced what he described as 'a new kind of machine'. He called these 'O-machines'. The present paper employs Turing's concept against a number of currently fashionable positions in the philosophy of mind | |||||||||
| Keywords | Brain Science System Penrose, R Searle, J Turing, A | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesStevan Harnad (1991). Other Bodies, Other Minds: A Machine Incarnation of an Old Philosophical Problem. 1 (1):43-54.
Justin Leiber (1995). On Turing's Turing Test and Why the Matter Matters. Synthese 104 (1):59-69.
Jack Copeland (1996). On Alan Turing's Anticipation of Connectionism. Synthese 108 (3):361-377.
Jack Copeland (1997). The Broad Conception of Computation. American Behavioral Scientist 40 (6):690-716.
B. Jack Copeland (2002). Accelerating Turing Machines. Minds and Machines 12 (2):281-300.
B. Jack Copeland (2000). The Turing Test. Minds and Machines 10 (4):519-539.
Justin Leiber (2006). Turing's Golden: How Well Turing's Work Stands Today. Philosophical Psychology 19 (1):13-46.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads61 ( #15,525 of 549,084 )Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #15,152 of 549,084 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
