|Abstract||Now we should have to answer the question: when were the questions on Perihermeneias written? Little is known about the chronology of Buridan's works. Even a relative date is diﬃcult to establish. However, some remarks can be made. First, there is the fact that the questions on Perihermeneias are quoted several times in Tractatus I of the Summule (4), in a way that makes it highly probable that the Summule were written after the Questiones on Perihermeneias (5). Now, according to professor Pinborg the ﬁrst lectura of the Summule may be dated as early as the late 1320es (6), that is at the very beginning of Buridan's career as a teacher of philosophy at the university of Paris. This may be an indication for an early date of the Questiones on Perihermeneias, possibly as early as 1325. There are two other reasons for assuming that the commentary on Perihermeneias is one of Buridan's ﬁrst works. The ﬁrst clue is given by the places where Buridan refers to one of his own works: once he refers to his commentary on Porphyry's Isagoge (7), twice to his commentary on Aristotle's Metaphysics (8), and six times to his commentary on the Physics (9). The way in which he refers to these tracts seems also to be signiﬁcant: the reference to his commentary on Porphyry's Isagoge shows that this work is of an earlier date than the present work. As to the other two works, he only refers to the number of the book in which he is going to treat a particular subject, not to the number of the question. A (cross)reference to the Summule is not given, although, as Pinborg remarks, there is a general doctrinal concordance between the two works. The questions on Metaphysics do not contain a (cross)-reference to the questions on Perihermeneias, at least not on the places where one would expect them. I am not certain about possible references occurring in the commentary on Physics. However, we should be very careful to draw conclusions from the occurrence of references, since it is always possible that we are dealing with a second or third lectura of the text..|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Jean Buridan (1982). John Buridan on Self-Reference: Chapter Eight of Buridan's Sophismata, with a Translation, an Introduction, and a Philosophical Commentary. Cambridge University Press.
Gyula Klima (2009). John Buridan. Oxford University Press.
Johannes M. M. H. Thijssen (2005). Prolegomena to a Study of John Buridan's Physics. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 79 (3):493-502.
Porphyry (1823/1994). Select Works of Porphyry. Prometheus Trust.
Jean Buridan (1982). John Buridan on Self-Reference: Chapter Eight of Buridan's Sophismata. Cambridge University Press.
Catarina Dutilh Novaes (2005). Buridan's Consequentia: Consequence and Inference Within a Token-Based Semantics. History and Philosophy of Logic 26 (4):277-297.
Plotinus (1995). Ennead III.6: On the Impassivity of the Bodiless. Clarendon Press.
John Locke (1984). A Letter Concerning Toleration ; the Second Treatise of Government ; an Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Franklin Library.
C. G. Normore (2008). Validity Now and Then. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 38 (S1):19-30.
Stephen Read (2012). John Buridan's Theory of Consequence and His Octagons of Opposition. In J.-Y. Beziau & Dale Jacquette (eds.), Around and Beyond the Square of Opposition. Birkhäuser.
Robert Kilwardby (1987). On Time and Imagination =. Published for the British Academy by the Oxford University Press.
J. M. M. H. Thijssen (1986). Buridan, Albert of Saxony and Oresme, and a Fourteenth-Century Collection of Quaestiones on the Physics and on de Generatione Et Corruptione. Vivarium 24 (1):70-82.
Stephen Read (2012). The Medieval Theory of Consequence. Synthese 187 (3):899-912.
Added to index2011-05-14
Total downloads8 ( #131,640 of 722,765 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,437 of 722,765 )
How can I increase my downloads?