Journal of Business Ethics 49 (2):143-165 (2004)
|Abstract||This paper's purpose is to assess how management's perceptions regarding certain aspects of environmental reporting relate to the firm's actual reporting strategy. Toward that end, we propose a model where a firm's environmental disclosure is conditional upon executive assessments of corporate concerns. The study relies on a survey that was sent to environmental management executives from European and North American multinational firms enquiring about the determinants of corporate environmental disclosure. Responses from these executives were then contrasted with their firms' actual environmental reporting practices, which was measured using a comprehensive multi-criteria grid. Results show that there is a relationship between environmental managers' attitudes toward various stakeholder groups and how those managers respond to the stakeholders via the decision to disclose and the actual disclosures made. Our model provides a perspective as to how a firm responds to the numerous stakeholders to whom it must be accountable. This accountability in turn relates to how the company communicates its actions to society in order to achieve or maintain its social legitimacy.|
|Keywords||environmental disclosure legitimacy theory media exposure stakeholder theory|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Esben Rahbek Gjerdrum Pedersen (2011). All Animals Are Equal, but …: Management Perceptions of Stakeholder Relationships and Societal Responsibilities in Multinational Corporations. Business Ethics 20 (2):177-191.
Reggy Hooghiemstra (2000). Corporate Communication and Impression Management – New Perspectives Why Companies Engage in Corporate Social Reporting. Journal of Business Ethics 27 (1-2):55 - 68.
A. Salama, K. Anderson & J. S. Toms (2011). Does Community and Environmental Responsibility Affect Firm Risk? Evidence From UK Panel Data 1994–2006. Business Ethics 20 (2):192-204.
Antonino Vaccaro & Dalia Patiño Echeverri (2010). Corporate Transparency and Green Management. Journal of Business Ethics 95 (3):487 - 506.
Tiina Johanna Onkila (2009). Corporate Argumentation for Acceptability: Reflections of Environmental Values and Stakeholder Relations in Corporate Environmental Statements. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 87 (2):285 - 298.
Irene Criado-Jiménez, Manuel Fernández-Chulián, Carlos Larrinage-González & Francisco Javier Husillos-Carqués (2008). Compliance with Mandatory Environmental Reporting in Financial Statements: The Case of Spain (2001–2003). [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 79 (3):245 - 262.
Charles H. Cho, Dennis M. Patten & Robin W. Roberts (2006). Corporate Political Strategy: An Examination of the Relation Between Political Expenditures, Environmental Performance, and Environmental Disclosure. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 67 (2):139 - 154.
Cedric E. Dawkins & John W. Fraas (2010). Beyond Acclamations and Excuses: Environmental Performance, Voluntary Environmental Disclosure, and the Role of Visibility. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 92 (4):655.
Anita Jose & Shang-Mei Lee (2007). Environmental Reporting of Global Corporations: A Content Analysis Based on Website Disclosures. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 72 (4):307 - 321.
Cheng-Li Huang & Fan-Hua Kung (2010). Drivers of Environmental Disclosure and Stakeholder Expectation: Evidence From Taiwan. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 96 (3):435 - 451.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #65,329 of 722,775 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,775 )
How can I increase my downloads?