David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Geography 1 (1):35 – 53 (1998)
This paper defends some aspects of the intentionalist and internationalist worldviews of (an expanded) mainstream development studies against certain moral claims emanating from the New Right and a diverse post-Left. I contend that citizens and states in the advanced industrial world have a responsibility to attend to the claims of distant strangers. Although it is difficult to specify in determinate ways how this responsibility should be discharged—save for attending to basic human needs and rights—the responsibility itself derives from the interlinking and asymmetrical exchanges that bind distant strangers together in an interdependent world economy. I draw on Rawls and Roemer to specify the nature of this responsibility. I also draw on Benhabib to make a modified Rawlsian theory of justice less abstract while continuing to insist on the possibility and necessity of conversations between radically different social actors. The final part of the paper attends to questions of plausibility. I suggest that New Right and (more so) post-Left critiques of an expanded mainstream in development studies and policy are ethically deficient to the extent that they commend alternative development strategies without giving proper consideration to their costs and disbenefits. Development ethics, I conclude, is not just about questions of transnational justice and positionality; it is also about the construction of plausible alternative worlds and practical development policies.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Michael Sandel (2003). Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. In Derek Matravers & Jonathan E. Pike (eds.), Journal of Philosophy. Routledge, in Association with the Open University 336-343.
J. Rawls (1995). Political Liberalism. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.
Anthony Giddens (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
Seyla Benhabib (1992). Situating the Self: Gender, Community, and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics. Routledge.
Amartya Sen (1999). Commodities and Capabilities. Oxford University Press India.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Sandra Harding (1998). Gender, Development, and Post-Enlightenment Philosophies of Science. Hypatia 13 (3):146 - 167.
Trevor William Parfitt (2011). Post-Development and its Discontents. Journal of Critical Realism 10 (4):442-464.
Nigel Dower (2008). The Nature and Scope of Development Ethics. Journal of Global Ethics 4 (3):183 – 193.
Franziska Dübgen (2012). Africa Humiliated? Misrecognition in Development Aid. Res Publica 18 (1):65-77.
Robin Attfield & Barry Wilkins (eds.) (1992). International Justice and the Third World: Studies in the Philosophy of Development. Routledge.
Neelke Doorn (2012). Responsibility Ascriptions in Technology Development and Engineering: Three Perspectives. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (1):69-90.
M. Haque (2000). Environmental Discourse and Sustainable Development Linkages and Limitations. Ethics and the Environment 5 (1):3-21.
Donald Gotterbarn (2001). Informatics and Professional Responsibility. Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (2):221-230.
David M. Smith (1999). Social Justice and the Ethics of Development in Post-Apartheid South Africa. Philosophy and Geography 2 (2):157 – 177.
Ivan Marquez (2005). Development, Ethics, and the Ethics of Development. World Futures 61 (4):307 – 316.
Added to index2009-02-04
Total downloads26 ( #148,263 of 1,902,049 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #466,347 of 1,902,049 )
How can I increase my downloads?