Falsificationism and statistical learning theory: Comparing the Popper and vapnik-chervonenkis dimensions [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal for General Philosophy of Science 40 (1):51 - 58 (2009)
We compare Karl Popper’s ideas concerning the falsifiability of a theory with similar notions from the part of statistical learning theory known as VC-theory . Popper’s notion of the dimension of a theory is contrasted with the apparently very similar VC-dimension. Having located some divergences, we discuss how best to view Popper’s work from the perspective of statistical learning theory, either as a precursor or as aiming to capture a different learning activity.
|Keywords||Induction Popper Statistical learning theory Falsification Dimension of a theory|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Gilbert Harman & Sanjeev Kulkarni (2007). Reliable Reasoning: Induction and Statistical Learning Theory. A Bradford Book.
Pavel Tichý (1974). On Popper's Definitions of Verisimilitude. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 (2):155-160.
Peter Turney (1991). A Note on Popper's Equation of Simplicity with Falsifiability. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (1):105-109.
Citations of this work BETA
David Corfield (2010). Varieties of Justification in Machine Learning. Minds and Machines 20 (2):291-301.
Similar books and articles
Struan Jacobs (1999). Thoughts on Political Sources of Karl Popper's Philosophy of Science. Journal of Philosophical Research 24:445-457.
Gilbert Harman & Sanjeev Kulkarni, Statistical Learning Theory as a Framework for the Philosophy of Induction.
Daniel Steel (2009). Testability and Ockham's Razor: How Formal and Statistical Learning Theory Converge in the New Riddle of Induction. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (5):471 - 489.
David L. Hull (1999). The Use and Abuse of Sir Karl Popper. Biology and Philosophy 14 (4):481-504.
John R. Wettersten (1978). Traditional Rationality Vs. A Tradition of Criticism: A Criticism of Popper's Theory of the Objectivity of Science. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 12 (3):329 - 338.
Nicholas Maxwell (2006). The Enlightenment Programme and Karl Popper. In I. I. Jarvie, K. Milford & D. Miller (eds.), Karl Popper: A Centenary Assessment. Volume 1: Life and Times, Values in a World of Facts. Ashgate.
Added to index2009-08-22
Total downloads16 ( #116,576 of 1,410,177 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #177,870 of 1,410,177 )
How can I increase my downloads?