David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Religious Studies 32 (4):449 - 461 (1996)
In this paper I examine the phenomenological possibility of peculiarly theistic experience. I present and explicate William Forgie's very powerful arguments against the possibility of such experience and Nelson Pike's recent response to Forgie. I argue that although Pike's refutation of Forgie ultimately miscarries, there are good reasons for rejecting what is the central thesis upon which all of Forgie's arguments rest. After canvasing several of these reasons and recommending an alternative thesis, I conclude that Forgie has not succeeded in establishing the phenomenological impossibility of theistic experience.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
J. William Forgie (1998). The Possibility of Theistic Experience. Religious Studies 34 (3):317-323.
J. William Forgie (1994). Pike's "Mystic Union" and the Possibility of Theistic Experience. Religious Studies 30 (2):231 - 242.
J. William Forgie (1985). Hyper-Kantianism in Recent Discussions of Mystical Experience. Religious Studies 21 (2):205 - 218.
Mark S. McLeod (1993). The Limits of Theistic Experience: An Epistemic Basis of Theistic Pluralism. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 34 (2):79 - 94.
J. William Forgie (1984). Thestic Experience and the Doctrine Of Unanimity. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 15 (1/2):13 - 30.
J. William Forgie (1985). Mystical Experience and the Argument From Agreement. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 17 (3):97 - 113.
J. William Forgie (1986). The Principle of Credulity and the Evidential Value of Religious Experience. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 19 (3):145 - 159.
Timothy Chappell (2011). Theism in Historical Perspective. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (1):123 - 138.
Graham Oppy (1993). Modal Theistic Arguments. Sophia 32 (2):17-24.
Robert Oakes (1986). Theistic Orthodoxy, Theistic Consubstantialism, and Theistic Internalism. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 19 (3):177 - 189.
Mark T. Nelson (1996). Who Are the Best Judges of Theistic Arguments? Sophia 35 (2):1-12.
Paul Brockelman (1997). The Miracle of Being: Cosmology and the Experience of God. [REVIEW] Human Studies 20 (2):287-301.
Jerome Gellman (1998). On a Sociological Challenge to the Veridicality of Religious Experience. Religious Studies 34 (3):235-251.
Owen Ware (2007). Rudolph Otto's Idea of the Holy: A Reappraisal. Heythrop Journal 48 (1):48–60.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads6 ( #202,005 of 1,098,967 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #79,853 of 1,098,967 )
How can I increase my downloads?