Philosophical Quarterly 55 (218):78–89 (2005)
|Abstract||P.M.S. Hacker has argued that there are numerous misconceptions in James Conant's account of Wittgenstein's views and of those of Carnap. I discuss only Hacker's treatment of Conant on logical syntax in the 'Tractatus'. I try to show that passages in the 'Tractatus' which Hacker takes to count strongly against Conant's view do no such thing, and that he himself has not explained how he can account for a significant passage which certainly appears to support Conant's reading|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Kevin M. Cahill (2008). Elucidation, Meta-Philosophy, and Hacker's Use of “External Evidence”. Journal of Philosophical Research 33:73-99.
James Conant & Cora Diamond (2004). On Reading the Tractatus Resolutely: Reply to Meredith Williams and Peter Sullivan. In Max Kölbel & Bernhard Weiss (eds.), Wittgenstein's lasting significance. Routledge.
James Conant & Cora Diamond (2004). On Reading the Tractatus Resolutely: Reply to Meredith Williams and Peter Sullivan. In Max Kölbel & Bernhard Weiss (eds.), Wittgenstein's Lasting Significance. Routledge.
Kevin Cahill (2004). Ethics and the Tractatus: A Resolute Failure. Philosophy 79 (1):33-55.
Søren Overgaard (2007). The Ethical Residue of Language in Levinas and Early Wittgenstein. Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (2):223-249.
Nikolay Milkov (2003). The Method of the Tractatus. Contributions of the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society 11:139-41.
S. Awodey & A. W. Carus (2007). Carnap's Dream: Gödel, Wittgenstein, and Logical, Syntax. Synthese 159 (1):23-45.
P. M. S. Hacker (2003). Wittgenstein, Carnap and the New American Wittgensteinians. Philosophical Quarterly 53 (210):01–23.
Cora Diamond (2005). Logical Syntax in Wittgenstein's Tractatus. Philosophical Quarterly 55 (218):78 - 89.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads24 ( #51,701 of 549,528 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,528 )
How can I increase my downloads?