Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy of Science 35 (March):45-63 (1968)
|Abstract||Some materialists argue that we can eliminate mental entities such as sensations because, like electrons, they are theoretical entities postulated as parts of scientific explanations, but, unlike electrons, they are unnecessary for such explanations. As Quine says, any explanatory role of mental entities can be played by "correlative physiological states and events instead." But sensations are not postulated theoretical entities. This is shown by proposing definitions of the related terms, 'observation term,' and 'theoretical term,' and then classifying the term 'sensation.' The result is that although 'sensation' is a theoretical term, it is also a reporting term because it is used to refer to phenomena we are aware of. Consequently sensations are not postulated and cannot be eliminated merely because they are unnecessary for explanation|
|Keywords||Epistemology Materialism Mental States Sensation Term|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
William G. Lycan (1976). Quine's Materialism. Philosophia 6 (March):101-30.
David M. Rosenthal (2000). Addendum to Introduction. In Materialism and the Mind-Body Problem. Hackett.
David M. Rosenthal (1986). Two Concepts of Consciousness. Philosophical Studies 49 (May):329-59.
Robert Nola (1980). Fixing the Reference of Theoretical Terms. Philosophy of Science 47 (4):505-531.
Kurt Baier (1962). Smart on Sensations. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 40 (May):57-68.
John Roberts (2001). Introduction. Business Ethics Quarterly 11 (1):67-71.
Peter Pagin (2000). Sensation Terms. Dialectica 54 (3):177-99.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #131,747 of 722,935 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,935 )
How can I increase my downloads?