Paradoxe du Mal et «ressemblances de famille»
Chôra 5:27-43 (2007)
| Abstract | Paradox of the Evil and "Family Ressemblances". The paper tackles the problem of Matter and evil in Plotinus. monistic metaphysics, especially in theperspective of the following aparent inconsistency: if there is no other principle but the Good, then the Good creates the Matter which is the absolute evil. Itfollows that the Good is bad, according to a certain axiom of Proclus, which states that the creator is to a higher degree all what the creature is. The authorshows that, despite what Proclus and then many modern critics believed, Plotinus is consistent within his system. He relies on the axiom that the creature is not all what the creator is, i.e. that the creator also gives what he has not. Therefore, the One gives the Intellect multiplicity and thought which He is deprived of and also gives the Matter the evil which He is also deprived of. The paper also shows that Plotinus developed a logic of ontological procession which is not Aristotelian. This logic does not work by formind classes, but chains of partially intransitive ressemblances. So, the Intellect ressembles the One (the Good), the Soul ressembles the Intellect and the Matter ressembles the Soul; yet the Matter resembles the One no more. Yet, the unity of the world is assured, because of the continuity of the chain. The extreme terms are contrary, though not in the Aristotelian sense of sharing in the same genus. A certain similarty with Wittgenstein's logic of "family resemblances" is striking, which means that not only Wittgenstein, but Plotinus also went beyond the Platonic-Aristotelian Vulgata, even while he was sticking to its linguage | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Jan Opsomer (2001). Proclus Vs Plotinus on Matter (De Mal. Subs. 30-7 ). Phronesis 46 (2):154-188.
Jan Opsomer (2001). Proclus Vs Plotinus on Matter (De Mal. Subs. 30-7 ). Phronesis 46 (2):154-188.
Rafael Pangilinan (2010). Evil in Plotinus’ Hypostases of Being. Philosophy Pathways (150).
Christian Schäfer (2004). Matter in Plotinus's Normative Ontology. Phronesis 49 (3):266-294.
Christian Schäfer (2004). Matter in Plotinus's Normative Ontology. Phronesis 49 (3):266-294.
Denis O'Brien (1999). La Matière Chez Plotin: Son Origine, Sa Nature. Phronesis 44 (1):45-71.
Denis O'Brien (1999). La Matière Chez Plotin: Son Origine, Sa Nature. Phronesis 44 (1):45-71.
Marilena Vlad (2007). De l'unité de l'intellect à l'un absolu. Chôra 5:121-139.
Denis OBrien (2011). Plotinus on the Making of Matter Part I: The Identity of Darkness. International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 5 (1):6-57.
I. Crystal (1998). Plotinus on the Structure of Self-Intellection. Phronesis 43 (3):264-286.
Diana Lobel (2011). Being and the Good: Maimonides on Ontological Beauty. Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 19 (1):1-45.
Richard Swinburne (2003). Freedom and Evil. In Julian Baggini & Jeremy Stangroom (eds.), What Philosophers Think. Continuum Press.
Ian Crystal (1998). Plotinus on the Structure of Self-Intellection. Phronesis 43 (3):264-286.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-12-01Total downloads5 ( #160,428 of 549,120 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,120 )How can I increase my downloads? |

