David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
"The Sophist seems to be concerned with two things: being and nonbeing, on the one hand, and true and false speech, on the other. If speech is either true or false speech, it seems not even plausible for being to be either being or nonbeing, since we would then be compelled to say that nonbeing is as much being as false speech is speech. If nonbeing, however, is being, then nonbeing cannot be nonbeing, for otherwise the falseness of false speech would not consist in its saying 'nonbeing.' And, in turn, if nonbeing is nonbeing, the falseness of' false speech again cannot consist in its saying 'nonbeing,' for it would then not be saying anything. If we then say that nonbeing is appearing, and appearing is not unqualified nonbeing, being is being and appearing, and we want to distinguish between the strict identity which belongs to being and the likeness of' nonbeing to the strict identity of being. We say, then, 'Here is Socrates himself' and 'Here is a likeness of Socrates.' Everything in the likeness of Socrates that is a likeness of' Socrates himself will generate a true speech of Socrates identical to another speech true of Socrates himself. Everything, how ever, in the likeness of Socrates that is not a likeness of Socrates himself yields a false speech of Socrates. Among the false speeches of Socrates would be, for example, the paint on Socrates' portrait but not the color of the paint that is true of Socrates himself. The paint, then, without the color (per impossibile), is not true of Socrates, but it certainly is not a likeness of Socrates either. The paint must be together with its color in order for it to be both a likeness of Socrates and nonbeing, but it seems to be utterly mysterious how by being together it can be that and by being apart it ceases to be anything of the sort. If every thing then is just what it is and nothing else, it is impossible for there to be any speech, either true or false, for speech is impossible unless something can be put together with something else..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Sandra Peterson (2011). Socrates and Philosophy in the Dialogues of Plato. Cambridge University Press.
Gary Alan Scott (2008). Erotic Wisdom: Philosophy and Intermediacy in Plato's Symposium. State University of New York Press.
Robert Metcalf (2009). The Trial of Socrates in Plato's Symposium. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (1):39-55.
Anne Sheppard (2008). Rhetoric, Drama and Truth in Plato's Symposium. International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 2 (1):28-40.
Mary P. Nichols (2009). Socrates on Friendship and Community: Reflections on Plato's Symposium, Phaedrus, and Lysis. Cambridge University Press.
Michael Durrant (1998). Plato's Quinean Beard: Did Plato Ever Grow It? Philosophy 73 (1):113-121.
Alessandra Fussi (2006). “As the Wolf Loves the Lamb”. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (1):51-80.
Emily R. Wilson (2007). The Death of Socrates. Harvard University Press.
Paul Muench (2009). Socratic Irony, Plato's Apology, and Kierkegaard's On the Concept of Irony. In Niels Jørgen Cappelørn, Hermann Deuser & K. Brian Söderquist (eds.), Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook. de Gruyter. 71-125.
Catherine Zuckert (2011). Socrates and Timaeus. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (2):331-360.
Christopher Moore (2011). Socratic Persuasion in the Crito. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (6):1021 - 1046.
Catherine Osborne (2006). Socrates in the Platonic Dialogues. Philosophical Investigations 29 (1):1–21.
S. Delcomminette (2003). False Pleasures, Appearance and Imagination in the "Philebus". Phronesis 48 (3):215 - 237.
Sylvain Delcomminette (2003). False Pleasures, Appearance and Imagination in the Philebus. Phronesis 48 (3):215-237.
Jacob Howland (2007). Plato's Dionysian Music?: A Reading of the Symposium. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 12 (1):17-47.
Added to index2011-07-19
Total downloads25 ( #70,638 of 1,102,926 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #183,068 of 1,102,926 )
How can I increase my downloads?