Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Philosophy of Education 46 (4):86-98 (2012)
|Abstract||This article is an investigation of two apparently contradictory impulses in Oakeshott's writings about liberal education. On the one hand, he implied that it was primarily ‘aesthetic’, something undertaken for its own sake with no practical consequences. On the other hand, he often implied that a student might undergo a moral transformation in the process of becoming educated. This article attempts to reconcile both these ideas in Oakeshott's thought, and to show that they are coherent within the German Bildung tradition|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Corey Abel (2005). Appropriating Aristotle. In Corey Abel Timothy Fuller (ed.), The Intellectual Legacy of Michael Oakeshott.
Corey Abel (forthcoming). Whatever It Turns Out To Be: Oakeshott on Aesthetic Experience. In Leslie MArsh Paul Franco (ed.), Whatever It Turns Out To Be: Oakeshott on Aesthetic Experience. Penn State UP.
Struan Jacobs & Ian Tregenza (2013). Rationalism and Tradition: The Popper–Oakeshott Conversation. European Journal of Political Theory:1474885112471274.
Efraim Podoksik (2009). Commentary on Elizabeth Corey's Interpretation of Michael Oakeshott. Zygon 44 (1):223-226.
Efraim Podoksik (ed.) (2012). The Cambridge Companion to Oakeshott. Cambridge University Press.
Timothy Fuller (2009). Oakeshott on the Character of Religious Experience: Need There Be a Conflict Between Science and Religion? Zygon 44 (1):153-167.
Corey Abel (2011). Oakeshott’s Wise Defense: Christianity as A Civilization. In Corey Abel (ed.), The Meanings of Michael Oakeshott's Christianity.
Leslie Marsh (2005). Constructivism and Relativism in Oakeshott. In Corey Abel & Timothy Fuller (eds.), In The Intellectual Legacy of Michael Oakeshott. Imprint Academic.
Kevin Williams (2009). Vision and Elusiveness in Philosophy of Education: R. S. Peters on the Legacy of Michael Oakeshott. Journal of Philosophy of Education 43 (1):223-240.
Walter B. Mead (2004). The Importance of Michael Oakeshott for Polanyian Studies. Tradition and Discovery 31 (2):37-44.
Elizabeth Corey (2009). Religion and the Mode of Practice in Michael Oakeshott. Zygon 44 (1):139-151.
Steven Anthony Gerencser (2000). The Skeptic's Oakeshott. St. Martin's Press.
Mark T. Mitchell (2001). Michael Polanyi and Michael Oakeshott. Tradition and Discovery 28 (2):23-34.
Paul Franco (2003). Oakeshott, Berlin, and Liberalism. Political Theory 31 (4):484-507.
Leslie Marsh (2009). Introduction to Oakeshott Symposium. Zygon 44 (1):133-137.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-10-02
Total downloads2 ( #246,187 of 734,603 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 734,603 )
How can I increase my downloads?