David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 2 (3):283-297 (1999)
The scope of this essay is to introduce and explain the methodology underlying the Lanza Foundation Protocol for the analysis of clinical cases. The essay is divided in three parts. Part one examines the Protocol's methodology within the whole evolutionary framework of argumentation in bioethics. Particular attention is given to the most significant methodologies developed in European bioethics. Part two describes the system of argumentation which serves as a frame for both approaches, namely, the normative and the hermeneutical. Finally, the third part presents in an analytic fashion the operations which define the Protocol itself. The Protocol is the result of an interdisciplinary effort and it provides a detailed grid for analyzing and tackling the ethical components of clinical cases. The Protocol is primarily directed toward Ethics Committees in their consulting activity, yet it has been proven of considerable importance at an educational level also, particular in continuing education programs for health care professionals
|Keywords||bioethics education clinical bioethics clinical consultations clinical ethics committees ethical judgement ethical methodology European approach to bioethics practical rationality|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Peter Hucklenbroich (1998). Steps Towards a Theory of Medical Practice. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19 (3):215-228.
Sally Clayton & Bruce Bongar (1994). The Use of Consultation in Psychological Practice: Ethical, Legal, and Clinical Considerations. Ethics and Behavior 4 (1):43 – 57.
Jonathan Ives (2014). A Method of Reflexive Balancing in a Pragmatic, Interdisciplinary and Reflexive Bioethics. Bioethics 28 (6):302-312.
Sandra Bruneau (1998). Adding Pep (Protocol, Ethics, and Policies) to the Preparation of New Professionals. Ethics and Behavior 8 (3):249 – 267.
Vic Larcher (2009). The Development and Function of Clinical Ethics Committees (CECs) in the United Kingdom. Diametros 22:47-63.
Jos V. M. Welie (1998). Clinical Ethics: Theory or Practice? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19 (3):295-312.
Stella Reiter-Theil (2004). Does Empirical Research Make Bioethics More Relevant? “The Embedded Researcher” as a Methodological Approach. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 7 (1):17-29.
John Puma & David L. Schiedermayer (1991). The Clinical Ethicist at the Bedside. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 12 (2).
Linda Farber Post (2007). Handbook for Health Care Ethics Committees. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Eleanor Updale (2009). The Role of Clinical Ethics Committees. Diametros 22:116-123.
Stephen L. Daniel (1994). Hermeneutical Clinical Ethics: A Commentary. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 15 (2).
Norbert L. Steinkamp Bert Gordijn Henk A. M. J. ten Have (2008). Debating Ethical Expertise. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18 (2):pp. 173-192.
Charles Weijer, Selecting Subjects for Participation in Clinical Research: An Empirical Inquiry and Ethical Analysis.
Joseph J. Fins, Matthew D. Bacchetta & Franklin G. Miller (1997). Clinical Pragmatism: A Method of Moral Problem Solving. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (2):129-143.
Added to index2010-08-31
Total downloads9 ( #155,581 of 1,098,626 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #79,088 of 1,098,626 )
How can I increase my downloads?