Religious Studies 42 (3):273-290 (2006)
|Abstract||In this paper I argue that traditional theism, in its theory, history, and practice has implications for the philosophy of nature. Namely, nature should be designed around aesthetic or meaningful principles and nature should be engineered in order to fulfil a fairly well defined set of purposes. If theism is true, we should be able to study nature objectively as a teleological system. After all, the teleological structure of nature is more important to us as spiritual beings than its mechanisms. Since a teleological philosophy of nature is no longer viable, traditional theism is untenable. (Published Online July 10 2006)|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Richard Swinburne (2000). Cosmological and Teleological Arguments. In The Rationality of Theism. Rodopi.
Justin P. McBrayer (2010). Skeptical Theism. Philosophy Compass 5 (7):611-623.
Richard L. Fern (2002). Nature, God, and Humanity: Envisioning an Ethics of Nature. Cambridge University Press.
Paul Sheehy (2006). Theism and Modal Realism. Religious Studies 42 (3):315-328.
Richard Swinburne (2004). The Existence of God. Oxford University Press.
Martin O. Yalcin (2011). American Naturalism on Pantheism 1. American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 32 (2):156 - 179.
Robin Collins (2009). God and the Laws of Nature. Philo 12 (2):142-171.
John Stuart Mill (1874/1970). Three Essays on Religion. New York,Ams Press.
Mark Wynn (2006). A Response to Cordry on Design. Religious Studies 42 (3):291-297.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #81,741 of 722,870 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,870 )
How can I increase my downloads?