The Philosophy of the Limit
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Deconstruction both by its friends and enemies has come to be associated with a set of cliches that completely misunderstands its ethical aspiration. It is particularly within the field of law that we can see the ethical force of deconstruction, and also illuminate its concrete and practical importance. In The Philosophy of the Limit Drucilla Cornell examines the relationship of deconstruction to questions of ethics, justice and legal interpretation. She argues that renaming deconstruction "the philosophy of the limit" will allow us to be more precise about what deconstruction actually is philosophically and hence to articulate more clearly its significance for law. Cornell explores the ethical and juridical significance of the so-called postmodern rebellion against metaphysics. A shared ethical rebellion links philosophers as different as Theodor Adorno, Jacques Derrida, Jacques Lacan, and Emmanuel Levinas. Together they present a new ethical configuration, new in its difference from both the critical social theory of J$u$urgen Habermas and the analytic jurisprudence of Nagel and Rawls. A key aspect of this newness is the centrality given to the relationship between questions of ethics and sexual difference. Cornell argues that the appeal of Lacan's analysis to feminists is that it helps to explain the profound hold the gender hierarchy has over Western culture, including its theories of political transformation. Under a Lacanian analysis the law of gender identity will be replicated in the laws of an existing legal system. This means that we cannot hope to sustain legal reforms unless the gender hierarchy is challenged. Cornell examines Derrida's position on the significance of the gender hierarchy in philosophy and explores its ethical and political importance. Derrida's intervention against legal positivism has important implications for the legal reforms necessary to protect marginalized groups. His emphasis on the limit, she argues, is crucial to thosewhose well-being and very lives may depend on legal transformation, women and homosexuals, for example. In an important contribution to legal philosophy, Cornell explores the affinities of Derrida's writings with recent liberal analytic jurisprudence. She also explores the differences. Comparing Rawls's and Derrida's accounts of justice, she argues that Derrida gives greater attention to the necessary utopian moment in his insistence on maintaining the divide between law, established norms, and justice. Cornell's focus on the importance of the limit and the centrality of the gender hierarchy allows her to offer a view of jurisprudence different from both critical social theory and analytic jurisprudence. As we watch the long-fought-for civil rights of women systematically overturned, we have reason to think about how the connections she makes shed light on an underlying truth of our social, political, and legal reality.
|Keywords||Deconstruction Ethics Law Philosophy Justice (Philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$7.30 used (86% off) $18.42 new (63% off) $43.23 direct from Amazon (12% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||B809.6.C67 1992|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Margaret E. Toye (2012). Donna Haraway's Cyborg Touching (Up/On) Luce Irigaray's Ethics and the Interval Between: Poethics as Embodied Writing. Hypatia 27 (1):182-200.
Margaret Davies (2012). The Law Becomes Us: Rediscovering Judgment. [REVIEW] Feminist Legal Studies 20 (2):167-181.
Jacques de Ville (2009). Derrida and Legal Scholarship: A Certain Step Beyond. [REVIEW] International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 22 (1):141-156.
Mario Di Paolantonio (2001). Pedagogical Law and Abject Rage in Post‐Trauma Society. Cultural Values 5 (4):445-476.
Clarence W. Joldersma (2009). A Spirituality of the Desert for Education: The Call of Justice Beyond the Individual or Community. Studies in Philosophy and Education 28 (3):193-208.
Similar books and articles
Saul Newman (2001). Derrida's Deconstruction of Authority. Philosophy and Social Criticism 27 (3):1-20.
Pavlos Eleftheriadis (2008). Legal Rights. Oxford University Press.
Penelope Deutscher (1997). Yielding Gender: Feminism, Deconstruction, and the History of Philosophy. Routledge.
Alan W. Norrie (2005). Law and the Beautiful Soul. Published in the United States by Cavendish Pub..
Drucilla Cornell (1991). Beyond Accommodation: Ethical Feminism, Deconstruction, and the Law. Routledge.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?