Graduate studies at Western
Minds and Machines 20 (2):291-301 (2010)
|Abstract||Forms of justification for inductive machine learning techniques are discussed and classified into four types. This is done with a view to introduce some of these techniques and their justificatory guarantees to the attention of philosophers, and to initiate a discussion as to whether they must be treated separately or rather can be viewed consistently from within a single framework.|
|Keywords||Bayesian Guarantee Induction Kernel methods|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Martin Možina, Jure Žabkar, Trevor Bench-Capon & Ivan Bratko (2005). Argument Based Machine Learning Applied to Law. Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (1):53-73.
Jonathan Ginzburg & Shalom Lappin, Using Machine Learning for Non-Sentential Utterance Classiﬁcation.
Kevin B. Korb (2004). Introduction: Machine Learning as Philosophy of Science. Minds and Machines 14 (4):433-440.
Jon Williamson (2004). A Dynamic Interaction Between Machine Learning and the Philosophy of Science. Minds and Machines 14 (4):539-549.
S. Russell (1991). Inductive Learning by Machines. Philosophical Studies 64 (October):37-64.
Added to index2010-06-09
Total downloads13 ( #95,561 of 739,304 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,304 )
How can I increase my downloads?