David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Consciousness and Cognition 15 (4):634-654 (2006)
According to the majority of the textbooks, the history of modern, scientific psychology can be tidily encapsulated in the following three stages. Scientific psychology began with a commitment to the study of mind, but based on the method of introspection. Watson rejected introspectionism as both unreliable and effete, and redefined psychology, instead, as the science of behaviour. The cognitive revolution, in turn, replaced the mind as the subject of study, and rejected both behaviourism and a reliance on introspection. This paper argues that all three stages of this history are largely mythical. Introspectionism was never a dominant movement within modern psychology, and the method of introspection never went away. Furthermore, this version of psychology’s history obscures some deep conceptual problems, not least surrounding the modern conception of “behaviour,” that continues to make the scientific study of consciousness seem so weird
|Keywords||*History of Psychology *Introspection *Myths Behaviorism Concepts Consciousness States Mind|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Richard E. Nisbett & Timothy D. Wilson (1977). Telling More Than We Can Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Processes. Psychological Review 84 (3):231-59.
F. Varela (1995). Neurophenomenology: A Methodological Remedy for the Hard Problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies 3 (4):330-49.
G. A. Miller (2003). The Cognitive Revolution: A Historical Perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (3):141-144.
Wilhelm Wundt (1969). Outlines of Psychology. G.E. Stechert.
Citations of this work BETA
Leonhard Schilbach, Bert Timmermans, Vasudevi Reddy, Alan Costall, Gary Bente, Tobias Schlicht & Kai Vogeley (2013). Toward a Second-Person Neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (4):393-414.
Gabriel Reyes & Jérôme Sackur (2014). Introspection During Visual Search. Consciousness and Cognition 29:212-229.
Anthony I. Jack (2011). Describing Inner Experience? Proponent Meets Skeptic. Philosophical Psychology 24 (2):283-287.
Anthony Ian Jack (2013). Introspection: The Tipping Point. Consciousness and Cognition 22 (2):670.
Similar books and articles
Thomas Natsoulas (1983). Concepts of Consciousness. Journal of Mind and Behavior 4 (1):195-232.
G. E. Zuriff (1985). Behaviorism: A Conceptual Reconstruction. Columbia University Press.
Michael E. Levin (1985). Introspection. Behaviorism 13 (2):125-136.
Stephen LeDoux (1993). About Behaviorology: An Introduction to the Incompatible Paradigms and Historical and Philosophical Developments Among Disciplines Addressing the Behavior of Individuals. Abcs.
Eddy A. Nahmias (2002). Verbal Reports on the Contents of Consciousness: Reconsidering Introspectionist Methodology. Psyche 8 (21).
P. Harzem (2004). Behaviorism for New Psychology: What Was Wrong with Behaviorism and What is Wrong with It Now. Behavior and Philosophy 32 (1):5-12.
Robert H. Wozniak (ed.) (1884/1993). Theoretical Roots of Early Behaviourism: Functionalism, the Critique of Introspection, and the Nature and Evolution of Consciousness. Routledge/Thoemmes Press.
Timothy D. Wilson (2003). Knowing When to Ask: Introspection and the Adaptive Unconscious. Journal of Consciousness Studies 10 (9):131-140.
Natika Newton (1985). Acting and Perceiving in Body and Mind. Philosophy Research Archives 11:407-429.
R. S. Peters (1951). Observationalism in Psychology. Mind 60 (January):43-61.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads131 ( #27,684 of 1,792,259 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #139,362 of 1,792,259 )
How can I increase my downloads?