On the Very Idea of a ‘Specific’ Medium: Michael Fried and Stanley Cavell on Painting and Photography as Arts

Critical Inquiry 34 (2):274-312 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Stanley Cavell and literary skepticism.Michael Fischer - 1989 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Perceiving the arts: an introduction to the humanities.Dennis J. Sporre - 2000 - Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall/Pearson.
Cavell on film.Stanley Cavell - 2005 - Albany: State University of New York Press. Edited by William Rothman.
Must we show what we cannot say?James Conant - 1989 - In R. Fleming & M. Payne (eds.), The Senses of Stanley Cavell. Bucknell. pp. 242--83.
The Cavell reader.Stanley Cavell - 1996 - Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell. Edited by Stephen Mulhall.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-12-05

Downloads
40 (#388,897)

6 months
11 (#222,787)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Diarmuid Costello
University of Warwick

Citations of this work

Bookwork as Demediation.Garrett Stewart - 2010 - Critical Inquiry 36 (3):410-457.
Pictorial Representation and Abstract Pictures.Elisa Caldarola - 2011 - Dissertation, Università Degli Studi di Padova

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references