Graduate studies at Western
Poiesis and Praxis 7 (1-2):135-150 (2009)
|Abstract||Important scientific, ethical and sociological debates are emerging over the trans-humanist goal to achieve therapeutic treatments to âcureâ the debilitation of age-related illness and extend the healthy life span of individuals through interventive biogerontological research . The scientific and moral discourses surrounding this contentious scientific field are mapped out, followed by a normative argument favouring âstrongâ deliberative democratic control of human life extension research. This proposal incorporates insights from constructive and participatory technology assessment, upstream public engagement and back-casting analysis; to outline a programme of participatory approaches to encourage two-way dialogue between scientific and citizen perspectives, and foster the long-term deliberative democratic governance of this developing field.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Leigh Turner (2004). Life Extension Research: Health, Illness, and Death. Health Care Analysis 12 (2):117-129.
Tee Rogers-Hayden, Alison Mohr & Nick Pidgeon (2007). Introduction: Engaging with Nanotechnologies – Engaging Differently? [REVIEW] NanoEthics 1 (2):123-130.
Brian Wynne (2011). Lab Work Goes Social, and Vice Versa: Strategising Public Engagement Processes. Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):791-800.
Robert Doubleday (2007). The Laboratory Revisited. NanoEthics 1 (2):167-176.
Susan Dodds & Rachel A. Ankeny (2006). Regulation of hESC Research in Australia: Promises and Pitfalls for Deliberative Democratic Approaches. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3 (1-2):95-107.
Shane J. Ralston, Democratic Governance and the Specter of Deliberative Consultancy: A Deweyan Assessment of the Deliberation Industry.
Tamra Lysaght, Rachel A. Ankeny & Ian Kerridge (2006). The Scope of Public Discourse Surrounding Proposition 71: Looking Beyond the Moral Status of the Embryo. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3 (1-2):109-119.
J. L. Schellenberg (2005). The Hiddenness Argument Revisited (II). Religious Studies 41 (3):287 - 303.
Susan Collins, Michael Kersey & Cindy Savage (2007). Local Dialogue Heard Around the World. World Futures 63 (5 & 6):353 – 364.
Jesús Vega Encabo & F. Javier Gil Martín (2007). Science as Public Sphere? Social Epistemology 21 (1):5 – 20.
Matthew Kearnes & Brian Wynne (2007). On Nanotechnology and Ambivalence: The Politics of Enthusiasm. [REVIEW] NanoEthics 1 (2):131-142.
Aubrey D. N. J. de Grey (2007). Life Span Extension Research and Public Debate: Societal Considerations. Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 1 (1).
Morgan P. Miles, Linda S. Munilla & Jeffrey G. Covin (2004). Innovation, Ethics, and Entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics 54 (1):97-101.
Added to index2010-09-14
Total downloads11 ( #107,531 of 738,363 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 738,363 )
How can I increase my downloads?