Tertium datur? Reflections on Owen Flanagan's consciousness reconsidered
Philosophical Psychology 8 (1):85-103 (1995)
| Abstract | Owen Flanagan's arguments concerning qualia constitute an intermediate position between Dennett's “disqualification” of qualia and the thesis that qualia represent an insurmountable obstacle to constructive naturalism. This middle ground is potentially attractive, but it is shown to have serious problems. This is brought out via consideration of several classic areas of dispute connected with qualia, including the inverted spectrum, Frank Jackson's thought experiment, Hindsight, and epiphenomenalism. An attempt is made to formulate the basis for a less vulnerable variant on the “middle ground” | |||||||||
| Keywords | Consciousness Naturalism Psychology Qualia Science Dennett, D Flanagan, O | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Owen J. Flanagan (1985). Consciousness, Naturalism and Nagel. Journal of Mind and Behavior 6:373-90.
David de Leon (2001). The Qualities of Qualia. Communication and Cognition 34 (1):121-138.
Todd Moody (2007). Naturalism and the Problem of Consciousness. Pluralist 2 (1):72-83.
Owen J. Flanagan (1991). Consciousness. In Owen J. Flanagan (ed.), The Science of the Mind. Mit Press.
Drakon Nikolinakos (2000). Dennett on Qualia: The Case of Pain, Smell and Taste. Philosophical Psychology 13 (4):505 – 522.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads5 ( #160,368 of 549,084 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,084 )How can I increase my downloads? |

