Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy of Science 55 (3):415-421 (1988)
|Abstract||In this paper, I will defend Paul Feyerabend's claim--that there are some scientific theories that cannot be refuted unless one of their rivals is first confirmed--by criticizing Ronald Laymon's well-known attack on Feyerabend's claim. In particular, I will argue both that the Second Law of Thermodynamics was not refuted before the Kinetic Theory's predictions were confirmed, and that it could not have been refuted without the confirmation of the remarkable predictions of some rival theory|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Steven Yates (1985). II. More on Democratic Relativism: A Response to Alford. Inquiry 28 (1-4):450-453.
Ian James Kidd (2012). Feyerabend, Pseudo-Dionysius, and the Ineffability of Reality. Philosophia 40 (2):365-377.
Jonathan Y. Tsou (2003). Reconsidering Feyerabend's 'Anarchism'. Perspectives on Science 11 (2):208-235.
Willem Fouché (2000). Arithmetical Representations of Brownian Motion I. Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (1):421-442.
Gunnar Andersson (1991). The Tower Experiment and the Copernican Revolution. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 5 (2):143 – 152.
Paul Hoyningen-Huene (2002). Paul Feyerabend Und Thomas Kuhn. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 33 (1):61-83.
Harvey Siegel (1989). Farewell to Feyerabend. Inquiry 32 (3):343 – 369.
C. Fred Alford (1985). III. Yates on Feyerabend's Democratic Relativism. Inquiry 28 (1-4):113 – 118.
Daniel Sirtes & Eric Oberheim (2006). Einstein, Entropy, and Anomalies. AIP Conference Proceedings 861:1147-1154.
Ronald Laymon (1977). Feyerabend, Brownian Motion, and the Hiddenness of Refuting Facts. Philosophy of Science 44 (2):225-247.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #114,693 of 751,991 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #62,995 of 751,991 )
How can I increase my downloads?