The informed neuron: Issues in the use of information theory in the behavioral sciences [Book Review]

Minds and Machines 5 (4):583-96 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The concept of “information” is virtually ubiquitous in contemporary cognitive science. It is claimed to be “processed” (in cognitivist theories of perception and comprehension), “stored” (in cognitivist theories of memory and recognition), and otherwise manipulated and transformed by the human central nervous system. Fred Dretske's extensive philosophical defense of a theory of informational content (“semantic” information) based upon the Shannon-Weaver formal theory of information is subjected to critical scrutiny. A major difficulty is identified in Dretske's equivocations in the use of the concept of a “signal” bearing informational content. Gibson's alternative conception of information (construed as analog by Dretske), while avoiding many of the problems located in the conventional use of “signal”, raises different but equally serious questions. It is proposed that, taken literally, the human CNS does not extract or process information at all; rather, whatever “information” is construed as locatable in the CNS is information only for an observer-theorist and only for certain purposes

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why biological neuroscience cannot replace psychology.Nick Chater - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):834-834.
A more substantive neuron doctrine.Joe Y. F. Lau - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):843-844.
How trivial is the “trivial neuron doctrine”?Steven G. Daniel - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):834-835.
A hypothesis of the code of nerve impulses.Pavel E. Moroz - 1980 - Acta Biotheoretica 29 (2):101-109.
Two radical neuron doctrines.Alex Byrne - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):833-833.
Interpreting neuroscience and explaining the mind.Ian Gold & Daniel Stoljar - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):856-866.
Autonomous psychology and the moderate neuron doctrine.Tony Stone & Martin Davies - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):849-850.
A slightly radical neuron doctrine.Frank Jackson - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):840-841.
Neuron doctrine: Trivial versus radical versus do not dichotomize.Barry Horwitz - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):839-840.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
124 (#134,414)

6 months
1 (#1,028,709)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Philosophy and Cybernetics.Frederick J. Crosson, Kenneth M. Sayre, Simon & Schuster - 1973 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 29 (2):227-227.

Add more references