Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||We review literatures on agreeing to disagree and on the rationality of differing priors, in order to evaluate the honesty of typical disagreements. A robust result is that honest truth-seeking agents with common priors should not knowingly disagree. Typical disagreement seems explainable by a combination of random belief influences and by priors that tell each person that he reasons better than others. When criticizing others, however, people seem to uphold rationality standards that disapprove of such selffavoring priors. This suggests that typical disagreements are dishonest. We conclude by briefly considering how one might try to become more honest when disagreeing.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Robin Hanson (2006). Uncommon Priors Require Origin Disputes. Theory and Decision 61 (4):319-328.
Robin Hanson (2003). For Bayesian Wannabes, Are Disagreements Not About Information? Theory and Decision 54 (2):105-123.
Harold Hillman (1995). Honest Research. Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (1).
Jeryl L. Mumpower & Thomas R. Stewart (1996). Expert Judgement and Expert Disagreement. Thinking and Reasoning 2 (2 & 3):191 – 212.
Christina Fang, Sari Carp & Zur Shapira (2011). Prior Divergence: Do Researchers and Participants Share the Same Prior Probability Distributions? Cognitive Science 35 (4):744-762.
Jonathan Quong (2005). Disagreement, Asymmetry, and Liberal Legitimacy. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 4 (3):301-330.
José Juan Moreso (2009). Legal Positivism and Legal Disagreements. Ratio Juris 22 (1):62-73.
Ian S. Markham (1989). World Perspectives and Arguments: Disagreements About Disagreements. Heythrop Journal 30 (1):1–12.
Amir Konigsberg (2012). The Problem with Uniform Solutions to Peer Disagreement. Theoria 79 (1):96-126.
J. L. Schellenberg (2005). The Hiddenness Argument Revisited (II). Religious Studies 41 (3):287 - 303.
Christopher W. Gowans (ed.) (2000). Moral Disagreements: Classic and Contemporary Readings. Routledge.
Brandon Carey (2011). Possible Disagreements and Defeat. Philosophical Studies 155 (3):371-381.
Ronald Fagin & Joseph Y. Halpern (1988). I'm OK If You're OK: On the Notion of Trusting Communication. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophical Logic 17 (4):329 - 354.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads8 ( #131,868 of 739,357 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,357 )
How can I increase my downloads?