David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8 (3):277 - 290 (2005)
Contemporary moral philosophy assumes an account of what it means to legitimately change one’s mind in ethics, and I wish to challenge this account by enlarging the category of the legitimate. I am just as eager to avoid illegitimate mind-changing brought on by deceit or brainwashing, but I claim that legitimacy should be defined in terms of transparency of method. A social reformer should not be embarrassed to admit that he acquired many beliefs about justice while reading Dickens. As such, appeals to the heart and the imagination are just as legitimate, within limits, as appeals to the mind; and showing can be as legitimate as telling. To demonstrate this, I consider the example of a vegetarian trying to ‘convert’ a carnivore. I then ask what it means when the carnivore claims to have been previously mistaken.
|Keywords||animal rights Cora Diamond moral imagination moral persuasion moral reasons Peter Singer Wittgensteinian ethics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Thomas Scanlon (1998). What We Owe to Each Other. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Raimond Gaita (1991). Good and Evil: An Absolute Conception. St. Martin's Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Kecia Ali (2015). Muslims and Meat‐Eating. Journal of Religious Ethics 43 (2):268-288.
Similar books and articles
Michael Lebuffe (2010). Change and the Eternal Part of the Mind in Spinoza. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (3):369-384.
Adam Waytz, Kurt Gray, Nicholas Epley & Daniel Wegner (2010). Causes and Consequences of Mind Perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14 (8):383-388.
L. Paul Husselbee (1994). Respecting Privacy in an Information Society: A Journalist's Dilemma. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 9 (3):145 – 156.
Tamás Demeter (2012). The Anatomy and Physiology of Mind: Hume's Vitalistic Account. In H. F. J. Horstmanshoff, H. King & C. Zittel (eds.), Blood, Sweat and Tears: The Changing Concepts of Physiology from Antiquity into Early Modern Europe. Brill
John Bricke (1996). Mind and Morality: An Examination of Hume's Moral Psychology. Oxford University Press.
Radu J. Bogdan (ed.) (1991). Mind and Common Sense: Philosophical Essays on Commonsense Psychology. Cambridge University Press.
Rupert Read (2003). Review: The Heart of What Matters: The Role for Literature in Moral Philosophy. [REVIEW] Mind 112 (447):506-509.
Theodore Gulesarian (1996). Can God Change His Mind? Faith and Philosophy 13 (3):329-351.
William E. Lyons (2001). Matters of the Mind. New York: Routledge.
Peter K. Machamer (2009). Descartes's Changing Mind. Princeton University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads39 ( #104,254 of 1,796,209 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #116,661 of 1,796,209 )
How can I increase my downloads?