Putting Creditors in Their Rightful Place: Corporate Governance and Business Ethics in the Light of Limited Liability [Book Review]

Journal of Business Ethics 102 (S1):21-32 (2011)
Abstract
Contemporary academic and policy discussions of corporate governance tend to accord primacy to the interests of shareholders. While the primacy (descriptive or prescriptive) of shareholders is argued for in various ways, others seek to promote a wider stakeholder model of the firm and its governance. In both cases, the interests of creditors tend to be neglected. In this paper, the fundamental position of creditors in a system of corporate law that offers limited liability is reasserted and explained, and the implications explored. It is demonstrated that there are, in effect, two modes of governance possible for a limited liability corporation: the “normal” mode, when shareholders’ interests are primary, and the “distressed” mode, when creditors’ interests are paramount. As a result of this analysis, writers on corporate governance who are influenced by certain managerial myths or economic theories of the firm are encouraged to view the position of shareholders in a more informed light. Writers on business ethics, who often find themselves contending, perhaps implicitly, with inappropriate understandings of the nature of business corporations and their governance, are similarly alerted to the weakness of certain positions perceived as antithetical to their agenda. Finally, business ethicists who advocate a stakeholder perspective are encouraged to recognize the position of creditors and to pay more attention to them as a stakeholder group
Keywords Bankruptcy  Company law  Corporate governance  Creditors  Governance  Limited liability  Shareholder primacy  Stakeholder theory  Suppliers  Trade creditors
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,392
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
John Hendry (2001). Missing the Target. Business Ethics Quarterly 11 (1):159-176.
Ian Maitland (2001). Distributive Justice in Firms. Business Ethics Quarterly 11 (1):129-143.

View all 6 references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Clive Smallman (2004). Exploring Theoretical Paradigms in Corporate Governance. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 1 (1):78-94.
Andrew West (2006). Theorising South Africa's Corporate Governance. Journal of Business Ethics 68 (4):433 - 448.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2012-01-07

Total downloads

6 ( #206,947 of 1,102,926 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #120,639 of 1,102,926 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.