Graduate studies at Western
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):87-114 (2001)
|Abstract||Miller (1956) summarized evidence that people can remember about seven chunks in short-term memory (STM) tasks. However, that number was meant more as a rough estimate and a rhetorical device than as a real capacity limit. Others have since suggested that there is a more precise capacity limit, but that it is only three to five chunks. The present target article brings together a wide variety of data on capacity limits suggesting that the smaller capacity limit is real. Capacity limits will be useful in analyses of information processing only if the boundary conditions for observing them can be carefully described. Four basic conditions in which chunks can be identified and capacity limits can accordingly be observed are: (1) when information overload limits chunks to individual stimulus items, (2) when other steps are taken specifically to block the recoding of stimulus items into larger chunks, (3) in performance discontinuities caused by the capacity limit, and (4) in various indirect effects of the capacity limit. Under these conditions, rehearsal and long-term memory cannot be used to combine stimulus items into chunks of an unknown size; nor can storage mechanisms that are not capacity-limited, such as sensory memory, allow the capacity-limited storage mechanism to be refilled during recall. A single, central capacity limit averaging about four chunks is implicated along with other, noncapacity-limited sources. The pure STM capacity limit expressed in chunks is distinguished from compound STM limits obtained when the number of separately held chunks is unclear. Reasons why pure capacity estimates fall within a narrow range are discussed and a capacity limit for the focus of attention is proposed. Key Words: attention; enumeration; information chunks; memory capacity; processing capacity; processing channels; serial recall; short-term memory; storage capacity; verbal recall; working memory capacity.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Niels A. Taatgen (2001). Dispelling the Magic: Towards Memory Without Capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):147-148.
Jerwen Jou (2001). The Magic Number Four: Can It Explain Sternberg's Serial Memory Scan Data? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):126-127.
James S. Nairne & Ian Neath (2001). Long-Term Memory Span. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):134-135.
Simon Grondin (2001). A Temporal Account of the Limited Processing Capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):122-123.
Elinor McKone (2001). Capacity Limits in Continuous Old-New Recognition and in Short-Term Implicit Memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):130-131.
Bart Rypma & John D. E. Gabrieli (2001). Functional Neuroimaging of Short-Term Memory: The Neural Mechanisms of Mental Storage. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):143-144.
Graeme S. Halford, Steven Phillips & William H. Wilson (2001). Processing Capacity Limits Are Not Explained by Storage Limits. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):123-124.
S. E. Avons, Geoff Ward & Riccardo Russo (2001). The Dangers of Taking Capacity Limits Too Literally. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):114-115.
Nelson Cowan (2001). Metatheory of Storage Capacity Limits. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):154-176.
K. Anders Ericsson & Elizabeth P. Kirk (2001). The Search for Fixed Generalizable Limits of “Pure STM” Capacity: Problems with Theoretical Proposals Based on Independent Chunks. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):120-121.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads237 ( #1,111 of 723,043 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,864 of 723,043 )
How can I increase my downloads?