David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (3):345-356 (2008)
Fairness in evaluation processes for women in science and engineering is only one of a set of issues that need to be addressed to reach gender equality. This article uses concepts from Amartya Sen’s work on inequality to frame gender issues in science and technology policy. Programs that focus on increasing the number of women in science and engineering careers have not generally addressed a broader set of circumstances that intersect with gender at various economic levels and stages of life. The agendas in research and innovation policies also need to reflect these issues, and fair allocation of resources within both science and technology needs to be on the agenda. Getting women into high-level positions is not enough. Articulating the full research and innovation agendas for women will require broader participatory processes.
|Keywords||Gender Policy Fairness|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Charles Weiss (2012). On the Teaching of Science, Technology and International Affairs. Minerva 50 (1):127-137.
Michiel Brumsen & Ibo van de Poel (2001). A Special Section on Research in Engineering Ethics Towards a Research Programme for Ethics and Technology. Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (3):365-378.
Erik Fisher (2011). Editorial Overview. Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):607-620.
Inmaculada Melo-Martín (2013). Patenting and the Gender Gap: Should Women Be Encouraged to Patent More? Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2):491-504.
Robert Figueroa & Sandra G. Harding (eds.) (2003). Science and Other Cultures: Issues in Philosophies of Science and Technology. Routledge.
Sybil Francis (1999). Developing a Federal Policy on Research Misconduct. Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):261-272.
Kate Grosser & Jeremy Moon (2005). Gender Mainstreaming and Corporate Social Responsibility: Reporting Workplace Issues. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 62 (4):327 - 340.
Kate Grosser (2009). Corporate Social Responsibility and Gender Equality: Women as Stakeholders and the European Union Sustainability Strategy. Business Ethics 18 (3):290-307.
Naonori Kodate, Kashiko Kodate & Takako Kodate (2010). Mission Completed? Changing Visibility of Women's Colleges in England and Japan and Their Roles in Promoting Gender Equality in Science. Minerva 48 (3):309-330.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #130,717 of 1,679,329 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #182,781 of 1,679,329 )
How can I increase my downloads?