David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 186 (2):577-600 (2012)
This paper analyzes concepts of independence and assumptions of convexity in the theory of sets of probability distributions. The starting point is Kyburg and Pittarelli’s discussion of “convex Bayesianism” (in particular their proposals concerning E-admissibility, independence, and convexity). The paper offers an organized review of the literature on independence for sets of probability distributions; new results on graphoid properties and on the justification of “strong independence” (using exchangeability) are presented. Finally, the connection between Kyburg and Pittarelli’s results and recent developments on the axiomatization of non-binary preferences, and its impact on “complete” independence, are described
|Keywords||Sets of probability distributions Independence Decision-making Preferences Convexity|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Bruno de Finetti (1970). Theory of Probability. New York: John Wiley.
P. Diaconis & D. Freedman (1980). Finite Exchangeable Sequences. The Annals of Probability 8:745--64.
Persi Diaconis & Sandy L. Zabell (1982). Updating Subjective Probability. Journal of the American Statistical Association 77 (380):822-830.
Peter Gärdenfors & Nils-Eric Sahlin (1982). Unreliable Probabilities, Risk Taking, and Decision Making. Synthese 53 (3):361-386.
Alan Hájek (2003). What Conditional Probability Could Not Be. Synthese 137 (3):273--323.
Citations of this work BETA
Arthur Paul Pedersen & Gregory Wheeler (2013). Demystifying Dilation. Erkenntnis (6):1-38.
Seamus Bradley & Katie Steele (2014). Uncertainty, Learning, and the “Problem” of Dilation. Erkenntnis 79 (6):1287-1303.
Similar books and articles
Carl Wagner (2011). Peer Disagreement and Independence Preservation. Erkenntnis 74 (2):277-288.
Wolfgang Spohn (1994). On the Properties of Conditional Independence. In Paul Humphreys (ed.), Patrick Suppes, Scientific Philosopher Vol. 1: Probability and Probabilistic Causality. Kluwer.
Henry E. Kyburg (1992). Getting Fancy with Probability. Synthese 90 (2):189-203.
Henry E. Kyburg Jr (1992). Getting Fancy with Probability. Synthese 90 (2):189 - 203.
Sara Miner More & Pavel Naumov (2010). An Independence Relation for Sets of Secrets. Studia Logica 94 (1):73 - 85.
Wolfgang Spohn (1980). Stochastic Independence, Causal Independence, and Shieldability. Journal of Philosophical Logic 9 (1):73 - 99.
Balazs Gyenis & Miklos Redei (2004). When Can Statistical Theories Be Causally Closed? Foundations of Physics 34 (9):1285-1303.
Itay Ben-Yaacov (2003). Discouraging Results for Ultraimaginary Independence Theory. Journal of Symbolic Logic 68 (3):846-850.
N. D. Mermin (1983). Pair Distributions and Conditional Independence: Some Hints About the Structure of Strange Quantum Correlations. Philosophy of Science 50 (3):359-373.
Added to index2011-09-09
Total downloads21 ( #86,416 of 1,101,857 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #41,658 of 1,101,857 )
How can I increase my downloads?