A further critique of Reichenbach's cosmological argument
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 9 (1):53 - 60 (1978)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesElliott Sober (2004). The Design Argument. In William Mann (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Religion. Blackwell Pub..
Michael J. Almeida & Neal D. Judisch (2002). A New Cosmological Argument Undone. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 51 (1):55-64.
Neal Judisch (2002). A New Cosmological Argument Undone. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 51 (1):55 - 64.
Bruce R. Reichenbach (1972). The Cosmological Argument: A Reassessment. Springfield, Ill.,Thomas.
Bruce R. Reichenbach (1970). Divine Necessity and the Cosmological Argument. The Monist 54 (3):401-415.
William Lane Craig (1997). In Defense of the Kalam Cosmological Argument. Faith and Philosophy 14 (2):236-247.
Elliott Sober (forthcoming). Reichenbach's Cubical Universe and the Problem of the External World. Synthese.
Graham Oppy (2002). Arguing About The Kalam Cosmological Argument. Philo 5 (1):34-61.
William Lane Craig (2006). J. Howard Sobel on the Kalam Cosmological Argument. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 36 (4):565-84.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads77 ( #10,351 of 549,013 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,261 of 549,013 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
