Graduate studies at Western
Philosophy 76 (3):371-395 (2001)
|Abstract||This paper examines some recent trends in feminist epistemology. It argues that theories that make a priori claims to the effect that the structure of our body of knowledge must encode a masculine bias are both philosophically problematic and politically counterproductive, and it recommends a feminist methodology free from such general theoretical claims as best suited for the promotion of productive feminist thought and action|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Susan J. Hekman (1995). Moral Voices, Moral Selves: Carol Gilligan and Feminist Moral Theory. Pennsylvania State University Press.
Linda Alcoff & Eva Feder Kittay (eds.) (2007). The Blackwell Guide to Feminist Philosophy. Blackwell Pub..
Brooke A. Ackerly (2000). Political Theory and Feminist Social Criticism. Cambridge University Press.
Sue V. Rosser (1987). Feminist Scholarship in the Sciences: Where Are We Now and When Can We Expect A Theoretical Breakthrough? Hypatia 2 (3):5 - 17.
Ann Garry & Marilyn Pearsall (eds.) (1996). Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy, 2nd Ed. Routledge.
Carole R. McCann & Seung-Kyung Kim (eds.) (2003). Feminist Theory Reader: Local and Global Perspectives. Routledge.
Rosemarie Tong (1996). Feminist Bioethics: Toward Developing a "Feminist" Answer to the Surrogate Motherhood Question. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (1):37-52.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads31 ( #45,055 of 755,261 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #38,532 of 755,261 )
How can I increase my downloads?