David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Bioethics 25 (6):326-333 (2011)
According to the principle of patient autonomy, patients have the right to be self-determining in decisions about their own medical care, which includes the right to refuse treatment. However, a treatment refusal may legitimately be overridden in cases where the decision is judged to be incompetent. It has recently been proposed that in assessments of competence, attention should be paid to the evaluative judgments that guide patients' treatment decisions.In this paper I examine this claim in light of theories of practical rationality, focusing on the difficult case of an anorexic person who is judged to be competent and refuses treatment, thereby putting themselves at risk of serious harm. I argue that the standard criteria for competence assess whether a treatment decision satisfies the goals of practical decision-making, and that this same criterion can be applied to a patient's decision-guiding commitments. As a consequence I propose that a particular understanding of practical rationality offers a theoretical framework for justifying involuntary treatment in the anorexia case
|Keywords||competence anorexia nervosa rationality Jehovah's Witness treatment refusal capacity|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Hannah Maslen, Jonathan Pugh & Julian Savulescu (2015). The Ethics of Deep Brain Stimulation for the Treatment of Anorexia Nervosa. Neuroethics 8 (3):215-230.
Demian Whiting (2015). Evaluating Medico-Legal Decisional Competency Criteria. Health Care Analysis 23 (2):181-196.
A. M. Ruissen, T. A. Abma, A. J. L. M. Van Balkom, G. Meynen & G. A. M. Widdershoven (2016). Moving Perspectives on Patient Competence: A Naturalistic Case Study in Psychiatry. Health Care Analysis 24 (1):71-85.
Similar books and articles
Rosamond Rhodes & Ian Holzman (2004). The Not Unreasonable Standard for Assessment of Surrogates and Surrogate Decisions. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (4):367-386.
Floris Tomasini (2010). A Broader Notion of Competent Decision Making in Respect to What Is in the Best Interests of Patients Affected by Anorexia. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 17 (2):155-157.
Anne-Cathrine Naess, Reidun Foerde & Petter Andreas Steen (2001). Patient Autonomy in Emergency Medicine. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (1):71-77.
Douglas O. Stewart & Joseph P. DeMarco (2005). An Economic Theory of Patient Decision-Making. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 2 (3):153-164.
Simona Giordano (2010). Anorexia and Refusal of Life-Saving Treatment: The Moral Place of Competence, Suffering, and the Family. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 17 (2):143-154.
Kristine Bærøe (2010). Patient Autonomy, Assessment of Competence and Surrogate Decision-Making: A Call for Reasonableness in Deciding for Others. Bioethics 24 (2):87-95.
Roy Gilbar & Ora Gilbar (2009). The Medical Decision-Making Process and the Family: The Case of Breast Cancer Patients and Their Husbands. Bioethics 23 (3):183-192.
Haavi Morreim (1983). Three Concepts of Patient Competence. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 4 (3).
Arthur R. Derse (1999). Making Decisions About Life-Sustaining Medical Treatment in Patients with Dementia. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (1):55-67.
Jos V. M. Welie & Sander P. K. Welie (2001). Patient Decision Making Competence: Outlines of a Conceptual Analysis. [REVIEW] Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (2):127-138.
Added to index2010-01-05
Total downloads96 ( #44,007 of 1,911,413 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #177,396 of 1,911,413 )
How can I increase my downloads?