Hypatia 8 (3):194-201 (1993)
|Abstract||In Science as Social Knowledge, Helen Longino offers a contextual analysis of evidential relevance. She claims that this "contextual empiricism" reconciles the objectivity of science with the claim that science is socially constructed. I argue that while her account does offer key insights into the role that values play in science, her claim that science is nonetheless objective is problematic.|
|Keywords||Feminist philosophy of science|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
K. Brad Wray (1999). A Defense of Longino's Social Epistemology. Philosophy of Science 66 (3):552.
Helen E. Longino (1987). Can There Be A Feminist Science? Hypatia 2 (3):51 - 64.
Jane Duran (1998). Philosophies of Science/Feminist Theories. Westview Press.
Helen E. Longino (1997). Comments on Science and Social Responsibility: A Role for Philosophy of Science? Philosophy of Science 64 (4):179.
Daniel Hicks (2011). Is Longino's Conception of Objectivity Feminist? Hypatia 26 (2):333-351.
Margret Grebowicz (2005). Consensus, Dissensus, and Democracy: What Is at Stake in Feminist Science Studies? Philosophy of Science 72 (5):989-1000.
Steve Fuller (1993). Book Review:Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry Helen E. Longino. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 60 (2):360-.
Justin B. Biddle (2009). Advocates or Unencumbered Selves? On the Role of Mill's Political Liberalism in Longino's Contextual Empiricism. Philosophy of Science 76 (5).
Stéphanie Ruphy (2006). "Empiricism All the Way Down": A Defense of the Value-Neutrality of Science in Response to Helen Longino's Contextual Empiricism. Perspectives on Science 14 (2):189-214.
Added to index2009-02-07
Total downloads10 ( #106,370 of 549,113 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,113 )
How can I increase my downloads?