David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 17 (16):1805-1815 (1998)
As drug testing has become increasingly used to maximize corporate profits by minimizing the economic impact of employee substance abuse, numerous arguments have been advanced which draw the ethical justification for such testing into question, including the position that testing amounts to a violation of employee privacy by attempting to regulate an employee's behavior in her own home, outside the employer's legitimate sphere of control. This article first proposes that an employee's right to privacy is violated when personal information is collected or used by the employer in a way which is irrelevant to the terms of employment. This article then argues that drug testing is relevant and therefore ethically justified within the terms of the employment agreement, and therefore does not amount to a violation of an employee's right to privacy. Arguments to the contrary, including the aforementioned appeal to the employer's limited sphere of control, do not account for reasonable constraints on employee privacy which are intrinsic to the demands of the workplace and implicit in the terms of the employment contract.
|Keywords||Philosophy Ethics Business Education Economic Growth Management|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
John Hasnas, Robert Prentice & Alan Strudler (2010). New Directions in Legal Scholarship. Business Ethics Quarterly 20 (3):503-531.
G. Stoney Alder, Marshall Schminke & Terry W. Noel (2007). The Impact of Individual Ethics on Reactions to Potentially Invasive HR Practices. Journal of Business Ethics 75 (2):201 - 214.
Kirsten Martin (forthcoming). Understanding Privacy Online: Development of a Social Contract Approach to Privacy. Journal of Business Ethics.
G. Stoney Alder, Marshall Schminke & Terry W. Noel (2007). The Impact of Individual Ethics on Reactions to Potentially Invasive HR Practices. Journal of Business Ethics 75 (2):201-214.
Similar books and articles
Edward J. Ottensmeyer & Mark A. Heroux (1991). Ethics, Public Policy, and Managing Advanced Technologies: The Case of Electronic Surveillance. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 10 (7):519 - 526.
John R. Rowan (2000). Limitations on the Moral Permissibility of Employee Drug Testing. Business and Professional Ethics Journal 19 (2):69-82.
Chris MacDonald & Bryn Williams-Jones (2002). Ethics and Genetics: Susceptibility Testing in the Workplace. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 35 (3):235 - 241.
A. Scott Carson (1995). Drug Testing and Privacy. Business and Professional Ethics Journal 14 (4):3-22.
Hugh LaFollette (1994). Mandatory Drug Testing. In S. Luper & C. Brown (eds.), Drugs, Morality, and the Law. Garland
Dan Davidson (1988). Employee Testing: An Ethical Perspective. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 7 (3):211 - 217.
Jennifer Moore (1989). Drug Testing and Corporate Responsibility: The “Ought Implies Can” Argument. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 8 (4):279 - 287.
Nicholas J. Caste (1992). Drug Testing and Productivity. Journal of Business Ethics 11 (4):301 - 306.
Michele Simms (1994). Defining Privacy in Employee Health Screening Cases: Ethical Ramifications Concerning the Employee/Employer Relationship. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 13 (5):315 - 325.
Anders J. Persson & Sven Ove Hansson (2003). Privacy at Work – Ethical Criteria. Journal of Business Ethics 42 (1):59 - 70.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads159 ( #22,939 of 1,906,923 )
Recent downloads (6 months)11 ( #60,326 of 1,906,923 )
How can I increase my downloads?