David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Faith and Philosophy 22 (1):77-86 (2005)
Michael Rea and Jeffery Brower have offered a provocative new model of the Trinity on the analogy of the Aristotelian solution to the problem of material constitution. Just as a fist and a hand can be distinct entities composed of a common matter and yet numerically the same object, so the persons of the Trinity can be distinct entities (persons) composed of a common "matter" (the divine essence) and yet numerically the same object (God). I express doubts about the degree to which this analogy sheds light on the doctrine of the Trinity due to the disanalogy that neither God nor the Trinitarian persons are to be thought of as composed of any sort of stuff and to the model’s lack of explanatory power as to how a common matter can be simultaneously imbued with seemingly incompatible forms to constitute one object
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jeffrey E. Brower & Michael Rea (2005). Material Constitution and the Trinity. Faith and Philosophy 22 (1):57-76.
Michael Rea (2005). Material Constitution and the Trinity. Faith and Philosophy 22 (1):57-76.
Michael Rea (2003). Relative Identity and the Doctrine of the Trinity. Philosophia Christi 5 (2):431 - 445.
William Hasker (2010). Constitution and the Trinity. Faith and Philosophy 27 (3):321-329.
Jeffrey E. Brower & Michael C. Rea (2005). 10. Understanding the Trinity. Logos: A Journal of Catholic Thought and Culture 8 (1).
Jeffrey E. Brower & Michael Rea (2004). Understanding the Trinity. Logos 8:145-157.
Michael Rea (2005). 10. Understanding the Trinity. Logos: A Journal of Catholic Thought and Culture 8 (1).
Edward Wierenga (2004). Trinity and Polytheism. Faith and Philosophy 21 (3):281-294.
Maria Rosa Antognazza (2001). Leibniz de Deo Trino: Philosophical Aspects of Leibniz's Conception of the Trinity. Religious Studies 37 (1):1-13.
Michael C. Rea (2009). The Trinity. In Thomas P. Flint & Michael C. Rea (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Theology. Oxford University Press. 403--429.
H. E. Baber (2008). Trinity, Filioque and Semantic Ascent. Sophia 47 (2):149 - 160.
Michael C. Rea (1998). Sameness Without Identity: An Aristotelian Solution to the Problem of Material Constitution. Ratio 11 (3):316–328.
James Cain (2006). Trinity and Consistency. Faith and Philosophy 23 (1):45-54.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads32 ( #63,219 of 1,410,137 )
Recent downloads (6 months)13 ( #17,461 of 1,410,137 )
How can I increase my downloads?