Educating for Moral Ability: Reflections on moral development based on Vygotsky's theory of concept formation
Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Moral Education 30 (2):113-129 (2001)
|Abstract||The idea examined here is that the development of moral ability shares important similarities with the development of conceptual thinking as outlined in the work of Lev Vygotsky. Most notably, the mature forms of both processes are ways of constructing meaning that are not governed by pre-established modes of behaviour. The principal suggestion here is that Vygotsky's theory of concept formation can be used as a generative model for understanding the development of moral ability in a way that challenges the notion of morality as rule-following behaviour. Understanding moral ability as a present-centred aptitude for creating meaning carries a two-fold significance for educators: it is theoretically useful for understanding the learning process in the context of a fundamental or universal interdependency, and of practical value inasmuch as it focuses on the importance of learning to think and act in the here and now|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Matthew Pamental (2010). A Trans-Actional Approach to Moral Development. Ethics and Education 5 (1):15-26.
Ronald Lee Zigler (1999). The Formation and Transformation of Moral Impulse. Journal of Moral Education 28 (4):445-457.
Vishalache Balakrishnan & Lise Bird Claiborne (2012). Vygotsky From ZPD to ZCD in Moral Education: Reshaping Western Theory and Practices in Local Context. Journal of Moral Education 41 (2):225-243.
Mark B. Tappan (1998). Moral Education in the Zone of Proximal Development. Journal of Moral Education 27 (2):141-160.
William J. Hague (1976). Positive Disintegration and Moral Education. Journal of Moral Education 5 (3):231-240.
Daniel Putman (1995). The Primacy of Virtue in Children's Moral Development. Journal of Moral Education 24 (2):175-183.
Paul Formosa (2011). Discipline and Autonomy: The Kantian Link Between Education and Morality. In Klas Roth & Chris Surprenant (eds.), Kant and Education: Interpretations and Commentary. Routledge.
Susanne Bobzien (2006). Moral Responsibility and Moral Development in Epicurus’ Philosophy. In B. Reis & S. Haffmans (eds.), The Virtuous Life in Greek Ethics. CUP.
Elizabeth M. Tucker & Daniel A. Stout (1999). Teaching Ethics: The Moral Development of Educators. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 14 (2):107 – 118.
Richard W. Wilson (1978). A New Direction for the Study of Moral Behaviour. Journal of Moral Education 7 (2):122-131.
Helen Weinreich (1975). Kohlberg and Piaget: Aspects of Their Relationship in the Field of Moral Development. Journal of Moral Education 4 (3):201-213.
Richard W. Wilson (1976). Some Comments on Stage Theories of Moral Development. Journal of Moral Education 5 (3):241-248.
Stephen A. Sherblom (2012). What Develops in Moral Development? A Model of Moral Sensibility. Journal of Moral Education 41 (1):117-142.
Einar Marnburg (2001). The Questionable Use of Moral Development Theory in Studies of Business Ethics: Discussion and Empirical Findings. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 32 (4):275 - 283.
Lawrence Kohlberg (1974). Education, Moral Development and Faith1. Journal of Moral Education 4 (1):5-16.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads6 ( #154,793 of 739,324 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,324 )
How can I increase my downloads?