|Abstract||Einstein's "spookiness" is now called nonlocality, the mysterious ability of Nature to enforce correlations between separated but entangled parts of a quantum system that are out of speed-of-light contact, to reach faster-than-light across vast spatial distances or even across time itself to ensure that the parts of a quantum system are made to match. This column is about nonlocality, and how, through Bell's theorem, the nonlocality implicit in nature has been demonstrated in the laboratory|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Federico Laudisa (1997). Contextualism and Nonlocality in the Algebra of EPR Observables. Philosophy of Science 64 (3):478-496.
Donald Bedford & Henry P. Stapp (1995). Bell's Theorem in an Indeterministic Universe. Synthese 102 (1):139 - 164.
Arthur Fine (1984). What is Einstein's Statistical Interpretation, or, is It Einstein for Whom Bell's Theorem Tolls? Topoi 3 (1):23-36.
Tomasz Bigaj (2010). How to (Properly) Strengthen Bell's Theorem Using Counterfactuals. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 41 (1):58-66.
Wayne C. Myrvold (2003). A Loophole in Bell's Theorem? Parameter Dependence in the Hess‐Philipp Model. Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1357-1367.
Manjit Kumar (2009). Quantum: Einstein, Bohr, and the Great Debate About the Nature of Reality. Hachette India.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads33 ( #36,559 of 549,071 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,071 )
How can I increase my downloads?