Graduate studies at Western
Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 98 (2):201-210 (1998)
|Abstract||The existence of object-dependent thoughts has been doubted on the grounds that reference to such thoughts is unnecessary or 'redundant' in the psychological explanation of intentional action. This paper argues to the contrary that reference to object-dependent thoughts is necessary to the proper psychological explanation of intentional action upon objects. Section I sets out the argument for the alleged explanatory redundancy of object-dependent thoughts; an argument which turns on the coherence of an alternative 'dual-component' model of explanation. Section II rebuts this argument by showing the dual-component model to be incoherent precisely because of its exclusion of object-dependent thoughts. Section III concludes with a conjecture about the further possible significance of object-dependent thoughts for the prediction of action|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
M. Bruns & Gianfranco Soldati (1997). Object-Dependent and Property-Dependent Concepts. Dialectica 48 (3-4):185-208.
Joshua Armstrong & Jason Stanley (2011). Singular Thoughts and Singular Propositions. Philosophical Studies 154 (2):205 - 222.
Steven E. Boër (1990). Object-Dependent Thoughts. Philosophical Studies 58 (1-2):51 - 85.
Sean Crawford (2006). Object-Dependent Thoughts. In Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd ed.
José Luis Bermúdez (2003). 'I'-Thoughts and Explanation: Reply to Garrett. Philosophical Quarterly 53 (212):432–436.
Harold W. Noonan (1990). Object-Dependent Thoughts and Psychological Redundancy. Analysis 50 (January):1-9.
Max F. Adams, R. Stecker & G. Fuller (1999). Object Dependent Thoughts, Perspectival Thoughts, and Psychological Generalization. Dialectica 53 (1):47–59.
Robert A. Stecker, Max F. Adams & Gary Fuller (1999). Object Dependent Thoughts, Perspectival Thoughts, and Psychological Generalization. Dialectica 53 (1):47-59.
Harold W. Noonan (1993). Object-Dependent Thoughts: A Case of Superficial Necessity but Deep Contingency? In John Heil & Alfred R. Mele (eds.), Mental Causation. Oxford University Press.
Teresa Marques (2006). On an Argument of Segal's Against Singular Object-Dependent Thoughts. Disputatio 2 (26):19-37.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads72 ( #14,324 of 729,710 )
Recent downloads (6 months)27 ( #4,617 of 729,710 )
How can I increase my downloads?