Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (4):511-512 (2002)
|Abstract||I claim that our desire to be special motivates us to suppose that if we were not God created, we must be self-created. I also claim that Stephen J Gould's claims about punctuated equilibrium, the absence of directional selection, and exaptations, when taken together, lead to kind of secular creationism. I introduce the notion of “adaptive effects” and argue that a focus on the actual physiological and psychological mechanisms that produce adaptations provides a way out of the exaptation dilemma.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michael J. Reiss (2011). How Should Creationism and Intelligent Design Be Dealt with in the Classroom? Journal of Philosophy of Education 45 (3):399-415.
Telmo Pievani (2003). Rhapsodic Evolution: Essay on Exaptation and Evolutionary Pluralism. World Futures 59 (2):63 – 81.
Alberto Voltolini (2008). The Seven Consequences of Creationism. Metaphysica 10 (1):27-48.
James L. Dannemiller (2002). Lack of Evidentiary Criteria for Exaptations? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (4):512-513.
Rob Pranger (1990). Towards a Pluralistic Concept of Function Function Statements in Biology. Acta Biotheoretica 38 (1).
Jeffrey Goodman (2004). A Defense of Creationism in Fiction. Grazer Philosophische Studien 67 (1):131-155.
Stuart Brock (2010). The Creationist Fiction: The Case Against Creationism About Fictional Characters. Philosophical Review 119 (3):337-364.
Derek Browne (2002). Troubles with Exaptationism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (4):510-511.
Nicholas S. Thompson (2002). Adaptation for, Exaptation As. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (4):531-532.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #169,995 of 722,863 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?