Navigating negative quantificational space
Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||This paper reports the ﬁndings from an interconnected set of experiments designed to assess children’s knowledge of the semantic interactions between negation and quantiﬁed NPs. Our main ﬁnding is that young children, unlike adults, systematically interpret these elements on the basis of their position in overt syntax. We argue that this observation can be derived from an interplay between fundamental properties of universal grammar and basic learning principles. We show that even when children’s semantic knowledge appears to diﬀer from that of adults, the observed diﬀerences..|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Charles W. Kalish & Christopher A. Lawson (2007). Negative Evidence and Inductive Generalisation. Thinking and Reasoning 13 (4):394 – 425.
Rachel Keen & Elizabeth S. Spelke, Young Children's Representations of Spatial and Functional Relations Between Objects.
Paul Ibbotson, Anna L. Theakston, Elena V. M. Lieven & Michael Tomasello (2012). Semantics of the Transitive Construction: Prototype Effects and Developmental Comparisons. Cognitive Science 36 (7):1268-1288.
Stephen Crain, Andrea Gualmini & Paul M. Pietroski (2005). Brass Tacks in Linguistic Theory: Innate Grammatical Principles. In Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence & Stephen Stich (eds.), The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents. New York: Oxford University Press New York.
Joshue Orozco (2010). I Can Trust You Now … but Not Later: An Explanation of Testimonial Knowledge in Children. [REVIEW] Acta Analytica 25 (2):195-214.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads6 ( #154,981 of 739,444 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 739,444 )
How can I increase my downloads?