David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Heythrop Journal 38 (2):165–171 (1997)
A promising argument for divine timelessness is that temporal life is possessed only moment by moment, which is incompatible with the existence of a perfect being.Since the argument is based on the experience of time’s passage, it cannot be circumvented by appeal to a tenseless theory of time.Neither can the argument be subverted by appeals to a temporal deity’s possession of a specious present of infinite duration.Nonetheless, because the argument concerns one’s experience of time’s passage rather than the objective reality of temporal becoming itself, it is considerably weakened by the fact that an omniscient being possessing perfect memory and foreknowledge, need not find such experience to be an imperfection
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Hugh Rice (2006). Divine Omniscience, Timelessness, and the Power to Do Otherwise. Religious Studies 42 (2):123-139.
William Lane Craig (1997). Talbot School of Theology Divine Timelessness and Necessary Existence. International Philosophical Quarterly 37 (2):217-224.
Arjan Markus (2004). Divine Timelessness: A Coherent but Unfruitful Doctrine? Sophia 43 (2):29-48.
William Lane Craig (1998). Divine Timelessness and Personhood. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 43 (2):109-124.
Gregory E. Ganssle, God and Time. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion.
Dean Zimmerman (2002). God Inside Time and Before Creation. In Gregory E. Ganssle & David M. Woodruff (eds.), God and Time: Essays on the Divine Nature. Oxford Up 75--94.
William Lane Craig (2000). Omniscience, Tensed Facts and Divine Eternity. Faith and Philosophy 17 (2):227--228.
Laura L. Garcia (1993). Timelessness, Omniscience, and Tenses. Journal of Philosophical Research 18:65-82.
William Lane Craig (1997). On the Argument for Divine Timelessness From the Incompleteness of Temporal Life. Heythrop Journal 38 (2):165-171.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads44 ( #82,463 of 1,778,394 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #291,352 of 1,778,394 )
How can I increase my downloads?