Philosophy, Logic, Science, History

Metaphilosophy 43 (1-2):20-37 (2012)
Analytic philosophy is sometimes said to have particularly close connections to logic and to science, and no particularly interesting or close relation to its own history. It is argued here that although the connections to logic and science have been important in the development of analytic philosophy, these connections do not come close to characterizing the nature of analytic philosophy, either as a body of doctrines or as a philosophical method. We will do better to understand analytic philosophy—and its relationship to continental philosophy—if we see it as a historically constructed collection of texts, which define its key problems and concerns. It is true, however, that analytic philosophy has paid little attention to the history of the subject. This is both its strength—since it allows for a distinctive kind of creativity—and its weakness—since ignoring history can encourage a philosophical variety of “normal science.”
Keywords history  scientism  analytic philosophy  science  method  logic
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9973.2011.01732.x
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,914
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Mikko Yrjönsuuri (2003). Finnish Studies in the History of Ancient and Mediaeval Philosophy. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 80 (1):357-369.
Matti Sintonen (2003). Realism and Growth of Knowledge—Philosophy of Science Since Eino Kaila. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 80 (1):285-326.
Aloysius Martinich (2003). Philosophical History of Philosophy. Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (3):405-407.
Matthew J. Brown (2012). John Dewey's Logic of Science. Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 2 (2):258-306.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

48 ( #70,025 of 1,725,578 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #167,283 of 1,725,578 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.