International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14 (2):165 – 185 (2000)
|Abstract||One of the principal objections to a tensed or dynamic theory of time is the ancient puzzle about the extent of the present. Three alternative conceptions of the extent of the present are considered: an instantaneous present, an atomic present, and a non-metrical present. The first conception is difficult to reconcile with the objectivity of temporal becoming posited by a dynamic theory of time. The second conception solves that problem, but only at the expense of making change discontinuous. The third conception is the most plausible: that "the present" is a non-metrical notion which must be completed by the mention of some event or interval in order to have a measure, in which case what is present varies with one's context.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Stephen David Ross (forthcoming). Re-Membering. International Studies in Philosophy Monograph Series:43-59.
Peter Lynds, Subjective Perception of Time and a Progressive Present Moment: The Neurobiological Key to Unlocking Consciousness.
John Stuart Mackenzie (1931). Cosmic Problems. London, Macmillan & Co., Ltd..
Bradford Skow (2012). Why Does Time Pass? Noûs 46 (2):223-242.
Eric Olson (2009). The Passage of Time. In Robin Le Poidevin (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Metaphysics. Routledge.
Michael Tooley (2000). Time, Tense, and Causation. Oxford University Press.
Sean Enda Power (2012). The Metaphysics of the 'Specious' Present. Erkenntnis 77 (1):121-132.
Thomas M. Crisp & Donald P. Smith (2005). 'Wholly Present' Defined. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (2):318–344.
Alexander R. Pruss (forthcoming). The a-Theory of Time and Induction. Philosophical Studies.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads30 ( #40,914 of 549,754 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,754 )
How can I increase my downloads?