Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2005)
|Abstract||Sense-perception—the awareness or apprehension of things by sight, hearing, touch, smell and taste—has long been a preoccupation of philosophers. One pervasive and traditional problem, sometimes called “the problem of perception”, is created by the phenomena of perceptual illusion and hallucination: if these kinds of error are possible, how can perception be what it intuitively seems to be, a direct and immediate access to reality? The present entry is about how these possibilities of error challenge the intelligibility of the phenomenon of perception, and how the major theories of perception in the last century are best understood as responses to this challenge|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jay F. Rosenberg (2000). Perception Vs. Inner Sense: A Problem About Direct Awareness. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 101 (2-3):143-160.
William Coleman Williams, Perceptual Disanalogy: On the Alstonian Analogy Argument From Religious Experience.
Rebecca Copenhaver (2010). Thomas Reid on Acquired Perception. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (3):285-312.
Georges Dicker (1980). Perceptual Knowledge. Dordrecht: Reidel.
David A. Givner (1982). Direct Perception, Misperception and Perceptual Systems: J. J. Gibson and the Problem of Illusion. Nature and System 4 (September):131-142.
David H. Sanford (1976). The Primary Objects of Perception. Mind 85 (April):189-208.
David R. Hilbert (2004). Hallucination, Sense-Data and Direct Realism. Philosophical Studies 120 (1-3):185-191.
A. D. Smith (2002). The Problem of Perception. Harvard University Press.
Tim Crane (2005). What is the Problem of Perception? Synthesis Philosophica 2 (40):237-264.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads132 ( #4,453 of 722,832 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #13,419 of 722,832 )
How can I increase my downloads?