Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Click here to configure this browser for off-campus access.
- Tim Crane (1991). Why Indeed? Papineau on Supervenience. Analysis 51 (January):32-7.
Similar books and articles
The main aim of this paper is to show that there is one version of supervenience of the mental on the physical which is entailed by token-token identity (I call this version change-supervenience); and to establish that of the other better known versions of supervenience in the literature (which I call difference-supervenience), none are so entailed. One consequence of this is that Burge's thought experiments while successful in refuting difference-supervenience cannot in themselves refute identity thesis. However, the introduction of change supervenience leads me to devise an analogous thought experiment against change-supervenience, thus refuting identity thesis as well.
Discussion of Tim Crane, Why indeed? Papineau on supervenience
|
|
There are no threads in this forum |
Nothing in this forum yet.

