Hypatia 12 (3):142-163 (1997)
|Abstract||Third wave anti-essentialist critique has too often been used to dismiss second wave feminist projects. I examine claims that Carol Gilligan's work is "essentialist," and argue that her recent research requires this criticism be rethought. Anti-essentialist feminist method should consist in attention to the relations of power that construct accounts of gendered identity in the course of different forms of empirical enquiry, not in rejecting any general claim about women or girls|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Mariam Fraser (2001). Visceral Futures: Bodies of Feminist Criticism. Social Epistemology 15 (2):91 – 111.
Silvia Stoller (2010). Expressivity and Performativity: Merleau-Ponty and Butler. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 43 (1):97-110.
D. Gene Witmer (2003). Dupre's Anti-Essentialist Objection to Reductionism. Philosophical Quarterly 53 (211):181-200.
Cressida J. Heyes (2000). Line Drawings: Defining Women Through Feminist Practice. Cornell University Press.
Susan J. Hekman (1995). Moral Voices, Moral Selves: Carol Gilligan and Feminist Moral Theory. Pennsylvania State University Press.
Alison Stone (2004). Essentialism and Anti-Essentialism in Feminist Philosophy. Journal of Moral Philosophy 1 (2):135-153.
Thomas I. White (1992). Business, Ethics, and Carol Gilligan's "Two Voices&Quot;. Business Ethics Quarterly 2 (1):51-61.
Uma Narayan (1998). Essence of Culture and a Sense of History: A Feminist Critique of Cultural Essentialism. Hypatia 13 (2):86 - 106.
Brooke A. Ackerly (2000). Political Theory and Feminist Social Criticism. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads27 ( #51,617 of 722,745 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,745 )
How can I increase my downloads?