Beyond the sensory/functional dichotomy

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):480-481 (2001)
Most current theories of category-specific semantic deficits appeal to the role of sensory and functional knowledge types in explaining patients' impairments. We discuss why this binary classification is inadequate, point to a more detailed knowledge type taxonomy, and suggest how it may provide insight into the relationships between category-specific semantic deficits and impairments of specific aspects of knowledge.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,938
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Koen Lamberts (2001). Category-Specific Deficits and Exemplar Models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):484-485.
James W. Garson (2001). (Dis)Solving the Binding Problem. Philosophical Psychology 14 (4):381 – 392.
Joseph Thomas Tolliver (1999). Sensory Holism and Functionalism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):972-973.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

9 ( #246,340 of 1,725,632 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #349,437 of 1,725,632 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.