In search of the best explanation about the nature of the Gene: Avery on pneumococcal transformation
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 39 (1):65-79 (2008)
In this paper I present a model of rational belief change, and I show how to use it to obtain a better insight into the debate about the nature of pneumococcal transformation, genes and DNA that took place in the forties, as a result of Oswald T. Avery’s work. The model offers a particular elaboration of the concept of inference to the best explanation, along decision theoretic lines. Within this framework, I distinguish different senses in which Avery’s team can be said to have proceeded with caution, thus throwing some light upon a persistent source of disagreement among researchers in the history of genetics. In addition, I explain why we are entitled to say that rival parties such as physicist Maclyn McCarty and biochemist Alfred Mirsky were epistemically rational, in spite of the fact that they reached different conclusions on the basis of the same evidence
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Sarah E. Berger (2001). Accounting for Infant Perseveration Beyond the Manual Search Task. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):34-35.
Roger Sansom (2008). Countering Kauffman with Connectionism: Two Views of Gene Regulation and the Fundamental Nature of Ontogeny. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (2):169-200.
Shiling Xiang (2010). Inquiry Into the Transcendence of Tang Dynasty Confucians to Han Dynasty Confucians and the Transformation of Traditional Confucianism in Terms of Lunyu Bijie. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5 (4):471-485.
Clark Glymour, The Computational and Experimental Complexity of Gene Perturbations for Regulatory Network Search.
Ute Deichmann (2008). Challenging the Protein Dogma of the Gene: Oswald T. Avery – a Revolutionary Conservative. In Oren Harman & Michael Dietrich (eds.), Rebels, Mavericks, and Heretics in Biology. Yale University Press.
Frank Portugal (2010). Oswald T. Avery: Nobel Laureate or Noble Luminary? Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 53 (4):558-570.
Alan L. Mackay (1999). From “the Dialectics of Nature” to the Inorganic Gene. Foundations of Chemistry 1 (1):43-56.
U. Deichmann (2004). Early Responses to Avery Et Al.'S Paper on DNA as Hereditary Material. Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 34 (2):207-232.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #148,583 of 1,696,589 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #345,974 of 1,696,589 )
How can I increase my downloads?