David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Cognitive Science 36 (2):224-260 (2012)
Three experiments explored online recognition in a nonspeech domain, using a novel experimental paradigm. Adults learned to associate abstract shapes with particular melodies, and at test they identified a played melody’s associated shape. To implicitly measure recognition, visual fixations to the associated shape versus a distractor shape were measured as the melody played. Degree of similarity between associated melodies was varied to assess what types of pitch information adults use in recognition. Fixation and error data suggest that adults naturally recognize music, like language, incrementally, computing matches to representations before melody offset, despite the fact that music, unlike language, provides no pressure to execute recognition rapidly. Further, adults use both absolute and relative pitch information in recognition. The implicit nature of the dependent measure should permit use with a range of populations to evaluate postulated developmental and evolutionary changes in pitch encoding
|Keywords||Absolute pitch Relative pitch Pitch memory Music Pitch perception Eye tracking|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Sarah C. Creel, Richard N. Aslin & Michael K. Tanenhaus (2008). Heeding the Voice of Experience: The Role of Talker Variation in Lexical Access. Cognition 106 (2):633-664.
Timothy Justus & Alexandra List (2005). Auditory Attention to Frequency and Time: An Analogy to Visual Local–Global Stimuli. Cognition 98 (1):31-51.
Daniel Swingley, John P. Pinto & Anne Fernald (1999). Continuous Processing in Word Recognition at 24 Months. Cognition 71 (2):73-108.
Citations of this work BETA
Micah R. Bregman, Aniruddh D. Patel & Timothy Q. Gentner (2012). Stimulus-Dependent Flexibility in Non-Human Auditory Pitch Processing. Cognition 122 (1):51-60.
Similar books and articles
Gottfried Schweiger (2012). Globalizing Recognition. Global Justice and the Dialectic of Recognition. Public Reason. Journal of Political and Moral Philosophy 4 (1-2):78-91.
Karl Aschenbrenner (1972). What is Pitch?A Note on the Dissociation of Language and Nature. Inquiry 15 (1-4):458 – 462.
Stephanie M. Stalinski & E. Glenn Schellenberg (2012). Music Cognition: A Developmental Perspective. Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (4):485-497.
Azriel Rosenfeld (1999). Is Visual Recognition Entirely Impenetrable? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):391-392.
Martin H. Fischer, Marianna Riello, Bruno L. Giordano & Elena Rusconi (2013). Singing Numbers… in Cognitive Space — A Dual‐Task Study of the Link Between Pitch, Space, and Numbers. Topics in Cognitive Science 5 (2):354-366.
Henkjan Honing & Annemie Ploeger (2012). Cognition and the Evolution of Music: Pitfalls and Prospects. Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (4):513-524.
Irene Appelbaum (2000). Merging Information Versus Speech Recognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):325-326.
Barbara Tillmann (2012). Music and Language Perception: Expectations, Structural Integration, and Cognitive Sequencing. Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (4):568-584.
Carl Dahlhaus (1989). The Idea of Absolute Music. University of Chicago Press.
Daniel K. L. Chua (1999). Absolute Music and the Construction of Meaning. Cambridge University Press.
Steven F. Savitt (1987). Absolute Informational Content. Synthese 70 (February):185-90.
William F. Thompson, Philip W. Graham & Frank A. Russo (2005). Seeing Music Performance: Visual Influences on Perception and Experience. Semiotica 156 (1/4):203-227.
Added to index2011-11-01
Total downloads3 ( #304,116 of 1,099,957 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #190,037 of 1,099,957 )
How can I increase my downloads?